A247 MEDITATION AND YOGA FOR IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME (MY-IBS): A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background When delivered in person, yoga is effective in managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) symptoms. However, research is needed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of yoga as a therapeutic option when delivered virtually. Aims The aim was to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a yoga program, delivered virtually, for patients with IBS. We hypothesized the program would be feasible and effective in improving outcomes in the intervention group compared to the control group. Methods Adults diagnosed with IBS were randomized to receive either a Hatha yoga intervention or to an advice-only control group. The intervention consisted of facilitator-led weekly online classes for eight weeks delivered using Microsoft Office Teams and daily home practice. Yoga sessions included sequential delivery of postures, chanting, breathing exercises, and meditation over four weeks, with integrated practice over the final four weeks. Feasibility was evaluated with recruitment and attrition rates, adherence, and safety. The primary outcome was severity of IBS symptoms (IBS-Symptom Severity Score, IBS-SSS). Secondary outcomes included anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and stress (Perceived Stress Scale) assessed at baseline and eight weeks. Unadjusted and adjusted analysis of variance (and covariance) models compared baseline and post-intervention data between groups using intent to treat analysis. Results Sixty-five participants participated (32 treatment, 33 control). The mean age was 44.2±14.1 years and 91% identified as female. Participants had been living with IBS for 11.7±11 years. Fifteen participants were lost to follow-up (20% attrition rate). Participants attended on average 5.9±1.7 out of a possible 8 sessions (74% adherence) and accumulated 1,187±545 minutes in daily practice over eight weeks. No adverse events were reported. The groups did not differ at baseline (P>0.05). From baseline to post intervention, unadjusted ANOVA models indicated the yoga program was not statistically superior to the control group for IBS-symptoms (-17.5 points; 95% CI -62.6 to 27.6; P = 0.440), anxiety (-0.91 points; 95% CI -2.47 to 0.64; P = 0.245) and stress (-0.65 points; 95% CI -1.73 to 0.44; P = 0.239). Significant differences between groups were seen for depression (-1.82 points; 95% CI -3.49 to -0.15; P = 0.033). A second model considered relevant covariates including age, comorbidities, and years since diagnosis (i.e., ANCOVA), and the results were similar to the unadjusted model. Conclusions Our virtual Hatha yoga and mediation program was feasible, and participants showed improvement in their depression scores. However, they did not experience a significant improvement in their IBS symptoms, anxiety, or stress, perhaps due to the short timeframe of the intervention. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».