A247 MEDITATION AND YOGA FOR IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME (MY-IBS): A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background When delivered in person, yoga is effective in managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) symptoms. However, research is needed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of yoga as a therapeutic option when delivered virtually. Aims The aim was to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a yoga program, delivered virtually, for patients with IBS. We hypothesized the program would be feasible and effective in improving outcomes in the intervention group compared to the control group. Methods Adults diagnosed with IBS were randomized to receive either a Hatha yoga intervention or to an advice-only control group. The intervention consisted of facilitator-led weekly online classes for eight weeks delivered using Microsoft Office Teams and daily home practice. Yoga sessions included sequential delivery of postures, chanting, breathing exercises, and meditation over four weeks, with integrated practice over the final four weeks. Feasibility was evaluated with recruitment and attrition rates, adherence, and safety. The primary outcome was severity of IBS symptoms (IBS-Symptom Severity Score, IBS-SSS). Secondary outcomes included anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and stress (Perceived Stress Scale) assessed at baseline and eight weeks. Unadjusted and adjusted analysis of variance (and covariance) models compared baseline and post-intervention data between groups using intent to treat analysis. Results Sixty-five participants participated (32 treatment, 33 control). The mean age was 44.2±14.1 years and 91% identified as female. Participants had been living with IBS for 11.7±11 years. Fifteen participants were lost to follow-up (20% attrition rate). Participants attended on average 5.9±1.7 out of a possible 8 sessions (74% adherence) and accumulated 1,187±545 minutes in daily practice over eight weeks. No adverse events were reported. The groups did not differ at baseline (P>0.05). From baseline to post intervention, unadjusted ANOVA models indicated the yoga program was not statistically superior to the control group for IBS-symptoms (-17.5 points; 95% CI -62.6 to 27.6; P = 0.440), anxiety (-0.91 points; 95% CI -2.47 to 0.64; P = 0.245) and stress (-0.65 points; 95% CI -1.73 to 0.44; P = 0.239). Significant differences between groups were seen for depression (-1.82 points; 95% CI -3.49 to -0.15; P = 0.033). A second model considered relevant covariates including age, comorbidities, and years since diagnosis (i.e., ANCOVA), and the results were similar to the unadjusted model. Conclusions Our virtual Hatha yoga and mediation program was feasible, and participants showed improvement in their depression scores. However, they did not experience a significant improvement in their IBS symptoms, anxiety, or stress, perhaps due to the short timeframe of the intervention. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".