MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4213233451 · doi:10.21693/1933-088x-3.1.3b

Joel D. Cooper, MD, the Physician Who Launched Lung Transplantation on Its Path to Successful Outcomes

2004· article· en· W4213233451 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueAdvances in Pulmonary Hypertension · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLaunchedPath (computing)MedicineTransplantationGerontologyInternal medicinePhysicsComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

You might say that every patient with pulmonary hypertension whose life has been extended by a lung transplant continues to live and thrive in the long shadow cast by Joel D. Cooper, MD, the physician who performed the first successful lung transplant surgery in 1983. Not that Dr Cooper would seriously consider this metaphor, but there is no doubting the everlasting impact of his research in lung transplantation.Dr Cooper no longer performs lung transplantation in PH, yet he remains a towering figure not only in this setting but in his other areas of clinical interest, including general thoracic surgery, lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema, myasthenia gravis, gastroesophageal reflux, and esophageal cancer. Although lung transplantation in PH has evolved significantly since the time when Dr Cooper pioneered the operation, the principles and precepts governing the technique when it was first performed offer insights into how far its evolution has progressed.Currently Chief of the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, Dr Cooper recalls his years in residency at Massachusetts General Hospital where he served under the well-known thoracic surgeon Hermes Grillo, MD, whom he credits as the inspiration for later research on lung transplantation. Moving to the University of Toronto after completing his residency in Boston, Dr Cooper was further encouraged by his colleagues to pursue his interest, particularly by William Nelems, MD, who had studied with surgeons in Europe. By 1978, 38 lung transplant operations had been attempted worldwide, but with no success. “Most of them were deathbed rescue attempts, maybe one attempted every other year around the world,” said Dr Cooper.“We went back to the lab and we saw that most of these patients had died within 2 weeks and those who lived longer all had complications of the airway connection. We studied these issues in a dog model and came up with a better understanding.” A combination of factors, including poor blood supply, posed obstacles to a successful outcome. “During surgery the bronchial arteries are severed and cannot be reconstructed. High doses of prednisone were also required to prevent rejection. We recognized that it was also sort of a wound-healing problem. Cyclosporin helped and finally we were able to improve the technique in a dog model.” Not long afterward, in 1983, Dr Cooper and his associates performed the first successful lung transplant.This first successful transplant occurred several years before additional attempts were made in patients with PH. “It was thought at the time that you needed to replace both the heart and the lung. We went back to the lab and working with a dog model we produced a model of right heart strain. We did it by gradually constricting the pulmonary artery with a band, tightening it every week or two until the right heart failed just as it does in the clinical situation. Then we released the band, dropping the pressure to more normal in these dogs and we studied how quickly the right ventricle recovers if you take the load off of it. This was a prelude to considering lung transplant rather than heart-lung transplant and we found that in these dogs there could be very rapid recovery of function in the right ventricle.”This led Dr Cooper and colleagues to rethink their strategy, namely, that they did not need to perform both a heart and a lung transplant. This meant that many more organs would be available for additional patients. “You could do a lung transplant and the heart would recover. We found that the heart undergoes remodeling, the thickened right ventricle returns to a more normal shape and thickness.” Dr Cooper recalls that a single lung transplant for PH was performed on November 21, 1989, in a woman who survived and lived for a number of years. “We do have good results for single lung transplant for PH even though a bilateral is done most of the time now. Fortunately, medical management of these patients has greatly improved, so the number of patients coming to transplant has diminished somewhat,” he added.“I've always felt that lung transplantation for PH is the most critical, most demanding surgery—not so much from a technical standpoint, although it does involve the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, but in terms of postoperative care of the patient. Therefore, the best results will be obtained by centers that are very experienced. The problem is, if you have too few centers of excellence, you are not accessible to the patient.”The program at Barnes Hospital, however, is exceptional in that the hospital assumes the responsibility for the patient while he or she is on the waiting list. “In the long term, successful outcomes for lung transplantation, particularly for PH, require an experienced team,” said Dr Cooper.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,497
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,756

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAdvances in Pulmonary HypertensionMême sujetTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207