MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213233451 · doi:10.21693/1933-088x-3.1.3b

Joel D. Cooper, MD, the Physician Who Launched Lung Transplantation on Its Path to Successful Outcomes

2004· article· en· W4213233451 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Pulmonary Hypertension · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaunchedPath (computing)MedicineTransplantationGerontologyInternal medicinePhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You might say that every patient with pulmonary hypertension whose life has been extended by a lung transplant continues to live and thrive in the long shadow cast by Joel D. Cooper, MD, the physician who performed the first successful lung transplant surgery in 1983. Not that Dr Cooper would seriously consider this metaphor, but there is no doubting the everlasting impact of his research in lung transplantation.Dr Cooper no longer performs lung transplantation in PH, yet he remains a towering figure not only in this setting but in his other areas of clinical interest, including general thoracic surgery, lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema, myasthenia gravis, gastroesophageal reflux, and esophageal cancer. Although lung transplantation in PH has evolved significantly since the time when Dr Cooper pioneered the operation, the principles and precepts governing the technique when it was first performed offer insights into how far its evolution has progressed.Currently Chief of the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, Dr Cooper recalls his years in residency at Massachusetts General Hospital where he served under the well-known thoracic surgeon Hermes Grillo, MD, whom he credits as the inspiration for later research on lung transplantation. Moving to the University of Toronto after completing his residency in Boston, Dr Cooper was further encouraged by his colleagues to pursue his interest, particularly by William Nelems, MD, who had studied with surgeons in Europe. By 1978, 38 lung transplant operations had been attempted worldwide, but with no success. “Most of them were deathbed rescue attempts, maybe one attempted every other year around the world,” said Dr Cooper.“We went back to the lab and we saw that most of these patients had died within 2 weeks and those who lived longer all had complications of the airway connection. We studied these issues in a dog model and came up with a better understanding.” A combination of factors, including poor blood supply, posed obstacles to a successful outcome. “During surgery the bronchial arteries are severed and cannot be reconstructed. High doses of prednisone were also required to prevent rejection. We recognized that it was also sort of a wound-healing problem. Cyclosporin helped and finally we were able to improve the technique in a dog model.” Not long afterward, in 1983, Dr Cooper and his associates performed the first successful lung transplant.This first successful transplant occurred several years before additional attempts were made in patients with PH. “It was thought at the time that you needed to replace both the heart and the lung. We went back to the lab and working with a dog model we produced a model of right heart strain. We did it by gradually constricting the pulmonary artery with a band, tightening it every week or two until the right heart failed just as it does in the clinical situation. Then we released the band, dropping the pressure to more normal in these dogs and we studied how quickly the right ventricle recovers if you take the load off of it. This was a prelude to considering lung transplant rather than heart-lung transplant and we found that in these dogs there could be very rapid recovery of function in the right ventricle.”This led Dr Cooper and colleagues to rethink their strategy, namely, that they did not need to perform both a heart and a lung transplant. This meant that many more organs would be available for additional patients. “You could do a lung transplant and the heart would recover. We found that the heart undergoes remodeling, the thickened right ventricle returns to a more normal shape and thickness.” Dr Cooper recalls that a single lung transplant for PH was performed on November 21, 1989, in a woman who survived and lived for a number of years. “We do have good results for single lung transplant for PH even though a bilateral is done most of the time now. Fortunately, medical management of these patients has greatly improved, so the number of patients coming to transplant has diminished somewhat,” he added.“I've always felt that lung transplantation for PH is the most critical, most demanding surgery—not so much from a technical standpoint, although it does involve the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, but in terms of postoperative care of the patient. Therefore, the best results will be obtained by centers that are very experienced. The problem is, if you have too few centers of excellence, you are not accessible to the patient.”The program at Barnes Hospital, however, is exceptional in that the hospital assumes the responsibility for the patient while he or she is on the waiting list. “In the long term, successful outcomes for lung transplantation, particularly for PH, require an experienced team,” said Dr Cooper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Pulmonary HypertensionSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207