A206 GALLSTONE IMPACTION IN THE DESCENDING COLON WITH SUCCESSFUL ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Gallstone impaction in the colon is a rare complication of cholelithiasis, typically because of gallstones migrating into the colon via a cholecystocolonic fistula. Gastrointestinal obstruction from gallstones only develops in 0.3–0.5% of patients with cholelithiasis and accounts for 0.095% of all mechanical bowel obstruction. Successful treatment has been described with endoscopic and surgical techniques. Aims This report aims to present a case of colonic obstruction from gallstone that was successfully treated endoscopically. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review on one patient including assessing the history of presenting illness along with biochemical, radiographic, and endoscopic results. We then conducted a narrative literature review on this subject matter. Results An 85-year-old male with known cholelithiasis complicated by prior cholecystitis presented with a 2-day history of generalized abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) showed fistulisation between the gallbladder and hepatic flexure. Follow-up CT with rectal contrast showed lack of contrast beyond an impacted gallstone in the descending colon (Figure 1A, 1B). The patient was deemed a poor surgical candidate thus endoscopic gallstone extraction was attempted. With a pediatric colonoscope, the 41mm x 51mm gallstone was visualized 70cm from anal verge (1C). The stone was too large to be extracted en-block with snare or basket. Attempts to cut the stone at its surface with a polypectomy snare and other tools were unsuccessful because of the roundness and smoothness of the stone. Although we could chip away at the surface, we were unable to break the seal of the stone against the colon mucosa. We found the most effective method was tunneling through the stone’s centre using a closed rat-tooth forceps, then angling the tip of the scope and pulling the scope back to break off fragments from within. A polypectomy snare was used to further breakup larger fragments to prevent repeat impaction (1D). There was underlying diverticular disease and mild ischemic changes to the mucosa but no stricture. The patient did well post-procedure and was able to tolerate oral intake, pass flatus, and pass bowel movements. He was discharged 3 days later. A recent systematic review found a total of 38 cases of gallstone obstruction of the colon. Majority of patients (73.6%) ultimately required surgical intervention. Overall mortality is 13.1%. Conclusions Gallstone impaction in the colon is uncommon with successful endoscopic treatment seldomly described. This report describes a rare complication of gallstone disease that was successfully treated with widely available endoscopic tools. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».