MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213376549 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.205

A206 GALLSTONE IMPACTION IN THE DESCENDING COLON WITH SUCCESSFUL ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL

2022· article· en· W4213376549 on OpenAlexaff
Getanshu Malik, David Yi Yang, Kevin Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGallstonesGallstone ileusImpactionBowel obstructionDescending colonGallbladderSurgeryFistulaRadiologyRectum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Gallstone impaction in the colon is a rare complication of cholelithiasis, typically because of gallstones migrating into the colon via a cholecystocolonic fistula. Gastrointestinal obstruction from gallstones only develops in 0.3–0.5% of patients with cholelithiasis and accounts for 0.095% of all mechanical bowel obstruction. Successful treatment has been described with endoscopic and surgical techniques. Aims This report aims to present a case of colonic obstruction from gallstone that was successfully treated endoscopically. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review on one patient including assessing the history of presenting illness along with biochemical, radiographic, and endoscopic results. We then conducted a narrative literature review on this subject matter. Results An 85-year-old male with known cholelithiasis complicated by prior cholecystitis presented with a 2-day history of generalized abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) showed fistulisation between the gallbladder and hepatic flexure. Follow-up CT with rectal contrast showed lack of contrast beyond an impacted gallstone in the descending colon (Figure 1A, 1B). The patient was deemed a poor surgical candidate thus endoscopic gallstone extraction was attempted. With a pediatric colonoscope, the 41mm x 51mm gallstone was visualized 70cm from anal verge (1C). The stone was too large to be extracted en-block with snare or basket. Attempts to cut the stone at its surface with a polypectomy snare and other tools were unsuccessful because of the roundness and smoothness of the stone. Although we could chip away at the surface, we were unable to break the seal of the stone against the colon mucosa. We found the most effective method was tunneling through the stone’s centre using a closed rat-tooth forceps, then angling the tip of the scope and pulling the scope back to break off fragments from within. A polypectomy snare was used to further breakup larger fragments to prevent repeat impaction (1D). There was underlying diverticular disease and mild ischemic changes to the mucosa but no stricture. The patient did well post-procedure and was able to tolerate oral intake, pass flatus, and pass bowel movements. He was discharged 3 days later. A recent systematic review found a total of 38 cases of gallstone obstruction of the colon. Majority of patients (73.6%) ultimately required surgical intervention. Overall mortality is 13.1%. Conclusions Gallstone impaction in the colon is uncommon with successful endoscopic treatment seldomly described. This report describes a rare complication of gallstone disease that was successfully treated with widely available endoscopic tools. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicBiliary and Gastrointestinal FistulasFrench-language works237,207