MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4214536997 · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000004081

Real-world Impact of 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2022· article· en· W4214536997 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueTransplantation · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVaccinationInstitutional review boardCohortKidney transplantationTransplantationCohort studyInformed consentDemographics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The humoral response to 2 doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine among transplant recipients is inferior to immunocompetent individuals.1 Data on the “real-world” impact of vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are lacking. We performed a cohort study investigating the impact of vaccination on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and outcomes in our kidney transplant program. COVID-19 vaccination and infection status between March 11, 2020, and July 19, 2021, were recorded for all KTRs in our program, along with demographics and clinical covariates associated with COVID-19 severity.2 This initiative was reviewed by institutional authorities at Unity Health Toronto and deemed to require neither approval from the Research Ethics Board nor written informed consent from participants. Weekly community infection rates for each public health unit of Ontario were used to define a patient-specific community infection risk. The primary outcome was COVID-19 infection in our study population. Severe COVID-19 infection (complicated by hospitalization and death) was analyzed as a secondary outcome. A time-varying Cox proportional-hazards model examined the association between vaccine status and the risk of COVID-19 infection, adjusting for age, sex, time posttransplant, kidney function, COVID-19–predisposing comorbidities, and the weekly infection rate in each patient’s community. Detailed methods are described in Supplementary Appendix S1 (SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). We evaluated 1793 KTRs. One thousand five hundred forty (85.9%) KTRs had received 1 vaccine dose, and 1402 (78.2%) had received 2 doses by study end. The median age was 60.4 y (interquartile range, 51.0–69.2), and the median time from transplantation was 8.1 y (interquartile range, 3.9–13.6; Table S1, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). There were 114 COVID-19 infections, of which 61% were severe (Table S2, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). Community infection rates (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 per 10 in 100 000 increase in weekly infection rate; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12) and transplant duration <3 mo (HR, 4.29; 95% CI, 1.5-12.23) were associated with infection risk (Table 1). Similar associations were observed for severe COVID-19 infections (Table 1). As compared with unvaccinated patients, double vaccination was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in COVID-19 infection (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.14-1.95) and severe infection (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.12-2.89). A sensitivity analysis examined the effect of administration of any vaccine dose on any COVID-19 infection (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.38-1.61; P = 0.5) and severe infection (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.53-2.8; P = 0.64) and found no change in the overall result. TABLE 1. - Associations between vaccine status and the risk of contracting COVID-19 or developing severe COVID-19 infection Variable HR Lower CI Upper CI P Association between vaccine status and the risk of contracting COVID-19 Vaccine dose 1 0.87 0.41 1.87 0.73 Vaccine dose 2 0.60 0.15 2.31 0.45 Age 0.99 0.98 1.01 0.36 Transplant duration >3 mo 1.24 0.51 2.30 0.64 Transplant duration 0–3 mo 4.29 1.50 12.23 0.007 Female sex 1.19 0.81 1.73 0.36 Latest eGFR 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.11 CDC score 1.03 0.89 1.19 0.73 COVID-19 community infection burden 1.08 1.04 1.12 <0.001 Association between vaccine status and the risk of developing severe COVID-19 infection Dose 1 1.48 0.62 3.52 0.38 Dose 2 0.40 0.08 1.97 0.26 Age 1.01 0.99 1.03 0.25 Transplant duration >3 mo 1.30 0.42 4.01 0.65 Transplant duration 0–3 mo 6.19 1.87 20.49 0.003 Female sex 1.09 0.67 1.77 0.74 Latest eGFR 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.12 CDC score 1.06 0.88 1.27 0.56 COVID-19 community infection burden 1.10 1.05 1.15 <0.001 The model adjusts for age (per 1 y increase), sex, transplant duration, latest eGFR, and geographical COVID-19 burden. The following were treated as time-varying variables: vaccine (none, 1, and 2 doses), transplant duration (0–3, 3–12, and >12 mo), and COVID-19 community infection burden per 100 000 population (HR reflects an increase in 10/100 000 population).CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio. Our study describes the impact of vaccines on COVID-19 infection when taking into account important time-varying nonvaccine variables such as community infection rates and transplant vintage, both of which were significant determinants of infection risk. Although our analysis of vaccination effectiveness may be limited by cohort size, importantly, a reduction in HR was observed with each vaccine dose, highlighting the benefit of vaccination in this cohort. These results form the basis for the guidance we provide our patients, which includes (1) the likely benefits of 2-dose vaccination regimens and (2) the importance of continued adherence to public health guidelines about masking and physical distancing to reduce infection risk. We were unable to directly address the role of mixed-dose vaccines, as only a very small minority received 2 different vaccines (Table S3, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). Importantly, although the antibody levels that confer resistance to infection are unknown, recent work demonstrates that a third vaccine dose yields greater immunogenicity in transplanted individuals.3-6 We note that our study predates the emergence of the Omicron variant, which is rapidly gaining dominance worldwide. Future studies must examine whether multidose vaccination strategies enhance real-world vaccine effectiveness among transplant patients in the Omicron era.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,296
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,683

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,334 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTransplantationMême sujetSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchTravaux en français237 207