MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214536997 · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000004081

Real-world Impact of 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2022· article· en· W4214536997 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaccinationInstitutional review boardCohortKidney transplantationTransplantationCohort studyInformed consentDemographics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The humoral response to 2 doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine among transplant recipients is inferior to immunocompetent individuals.1 Data on the “real-world” impact of vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are lacking. We performed a cohort study investigating the impact of vaccination on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and outcomes in our kidney transplant program. COVID-19 vaccination and infection status between March 11, 2020, and July 19, 2021, were recorded for all KTRs in our program, along with demographics and clinical covariates associated with COVID-19 severity.2 This initiative was reviewed by institutional authorities at Unity Health Toronto and deemed to require neither approval from the Research Ethics Board nor written informed consent from participants. Weekly community infection rates for each public health unit of Ontario were used to define a patient-specific community infection risk. The primary outcome was COVID-19 infection in our study population. Severe COVID-19 infection (complicated by hospitalization and death) was analyzed as a secondary outcome. A time-varying Cox proportional-hazards model examined the association between vaccine status and the risk of COVID-19 infection, adjusting for age, sex, time posttransplant, kidney function, COVID-19–predisposing comorbidities, and the weekly infection rate in each patient’s community. Detailed methods are described in Supplementary Appendix S1 (SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). We evaluated 1793 KTRs. One thousand five hundred forty (85.9%) KTRs had received 1 vaccine dose, and 1402 (78.2%) had received 2 doses by study end. The median age was 60.4 y (interquartile range, 51.0–69.2), and the median time from transplantation was 8.1 y (interquartile range, 3.9–13.6; Table S1, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). There were 114 COVID-19 infections, of which 61% were severe (Table S2, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). Community infection rates (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 per 10 in 100 000 increase in weekly infection rate; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12) and transplant duration <3 mo (HR, 4.29; 95% CI, 1.5-12.23) were associated with infection risk (Table 1). Similar associations were observed for severe COVID-19 infections (Table 1). As compared with unvaccinated patients, double vaccination was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in COVID-19 infection (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.14-1.95) and severe infection (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.12-2.89). A sensitivity analysis examined the effect of administration of any vaccine dose on any COVID-19 infection (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.38-1.61; P = 0.5) and severe infection (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.53-2.8; P = 0.64) and found no change in the overall result. TABLE 1. - Associations between vaccine status and the risk of contracting COVID-19 or developing severe COVID-19 infection Variable HR Lower CI Upper CI P Association between vaccine status and the risk of contracting COVID-19 Vaccine dose 1 0.87 0.41 1.87 0.73 Vaccine dose 2 0.60 0.15 2.31 0.45 Age 0.99 0.98 1.01 0.36 Transplant duration >3 mo 1.24 0.51 2.30 0.64 Transplant duration 0–3 mo 4.29 1.50 12.23 0.007 Female sex 1.19 0.81 1.73 0.36 Latest eGFR 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.11 CDC score 1.03 0.89 1.19 0.73 COVID-19 community infection burden 1.08 1.04 1.12 <0.001 Association between vaccine status and the risk of developing severe COVID-19 infection Dose 1 1.48 0.62 3.52 0.38 Dose 2 0.40 0.08 1.97 0.26 Age 1.01 0.99 1.03 0.25 Transplant duration >3 mo 1.30 0.42 4.01 0.65 Transplant duration 0–3 mo 6.19 1.87 20.49 0.003 Female sex 1.09 0.67 1.77 0.74 Latest eGFR 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.12 CDC score 1.06 0.88 1.27 0.56 COVID-19 community infection burden 1.10 1.05 1.15 <0.001 The model adjusts for age (per 1 y increase), sex, transplant duration, latest eGFR, and geographical COVID-19 burden. The following were treated as time-varying variables: vaccine (none, 1, and 2 doses), transplant duration (0–3, 3–12, and >12 mo), and COVID-19 community infection burden per 100 000 population (HR reflects an increase in 10/100 000 population).CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio. Our study describes the impact of vaccines on COVID-19 infection when taking into account important time-varying nonvaccine variables such as community infection rates and transplant vintage, both of which were significant determinants of infection risk. Although our analysis of vaccination effectiveness may be limited by cohort size, importantly, a reduction in HR was observed with each vaccine dose, highlighting the benefit of vaccination in this cohort. These results form the basis for the guidance we provide our patients, which includes (1) the likely benefits of 2-dose vaccination regimens and (2) the importance of continued adherence to public health guidelines about masking and physical distancing to reduce infection risk. We were unable to directly address the role of mixed-dose vaccines, as only a very small minority received 2 different vaccines (Table S3, SDC, https://links.lww.com/TP/C367). Importantly, although the antibody levels that confer resistance to infection are unknown, recent work demonstrates that a third vaccine dose yields greater immunogenicity in transplanted individuals.3-6 We note that our study predates the emergence of the Omicron variant, which is rapidly gaining dominance worldwide. Future studies must examine whether multidose vaccination strategies enhance real-world vaccine effectiveness among transplant patients in the Omicron era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207