Bedside echocardiography evaluation of a male with transient global amnesia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 50-year-old male with a history of hypertension, migraines, chronic back pain, and tobacco use presented to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of altered mentation. His wife reported that he suddenly became confused with short-term memory loss and was repeating questions after his morning cigarette. He denied head trauma, headache, vision changes, speech changes, weakness, or sensation loss to the extremities, chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, syncope, abdominal pain, or atypical back pain. Vital signs were within normal limits, except for initial blood pressure of 93/51 mm Hg. On physical examination, the patient was awake, alert, disoriented to time and place, and notable for global amnesia, however, there were no focal neurological deficits otherwise. The patient underwent emergent computed tomography (CT) brain imaging and neurology evaluation. Underlying intracranial bleed or acute ischemic stroke was ruled out. Neurology deemed the clinical presentation most consistent with transient global amnesia (TGA). Electrocardiogram revealed normal sinus rhythm without acute ischemic changes. All laboratory studies, which included cardiac biomarkers and urine drug screen, were within normal limits or negative. Bedside focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) was performed to evaluate for a potential cardiovascular etiology due to hypotension; FOCUS demonstrated a dilated proximal thoracic aorta diameter of 4.6 cm in the parasternal long-axis window and an aortic dissection flap visualized in the suprasternal notch window (Figure 1). CT angiography of the chest subsequently confirmed the diagnosis of type A aortic dissection (AoD) (Figure 2) for which cardiothoracic surgery emergently performed a successful operative repair of the aortic root. Timely ED detection of the seldom encountered, but highly lethal, condition of thoracic AoD is critical yet challenging given the considerable range of symptomatology.1-5 Our case provides a very rare description of painless AoD presenting as pure TGA, which has only been communicated in a few previous reports.6-12 Emergency physicians should specifically recognize thoracic AoD as a potential underlying etiology of TGA-like syndromes. The use of FOCUS in evaluating undifferentiated hypotension and a multitude of cardiovascular emergencies including AoD has been well-described.13, 14 Importantly, our case also illustrates an invaluable role for sonographic assessment of the thoracic aorta arch from the suprasternal notch window if AoD is suspected.15, 16 This report highlights a unique application of emergency physician-performed FOCUS to expedite the prompt bedside diagnosis of AoD in ED patients presenting with TGA. This research was supported in part by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».