MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223522731 · doi:10.1002/emp2.12716

Bedside echocardiography evaluation of a male with transient global amnesia

2022· article· en· W4223522731 on OpenAlexaff
Dasha Dewberry, Eric J. Kalivoda, Gabriel Cabrera Correa, Priscilla Cruz‐Menoyo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsBrandon Regional Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAortic dissectionChest painTransient global amnesiaPhysical examinationCardiologyRadiologyAnesthesiaInternal medicineSurgeryAmnesiaAorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 50-year-old male with a history of hypertension, migraines, chronic back pain, and tobacco use presented to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of altered mentation. His wife reported that he suddenly became confused with short-term memory loss and was repeating questions after his morning cigarette. He denied head trauma, headache, vision changes, speech changes, weakness, or sensation loss to the extremities, chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, syncope, abdominal pain, or atypical back pain. Vital signs were within normal limits, except for initial blood pressure of 93/51 mm Hg. On physical examination, the patient was awake, alert, disoriented to time and place, and notable for global amnesia, however, there were no focal neurological deficits otherwise. The patient underwent emergent computed tomography (CT) brain imaging and neurology evaluation. Underlying intracranial bleed or acute ischemic stroke was ruled out. Neurology deemed the clinical presentation most consistent with transient global amnesia (TGA). Electrocardiogram revealed normal sinus rhythm without acute ischemic changes. All laboratory studies, which included cardiac biomarkers and urine drug screen, were within normal limits or negative. Bedside focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) was performed to evaluate for a potential cardiovascular etiology due to hypotension; FOCUS demonstrated a dilated proximal thoracic aorta diameter of 4.6 cm in the parasternal long-axis window and an aortic dissection flap visualized in the suprasternal notch window (Figure 1). CT angiography of the chest subsequently confirmed the diagnosis of type A aortic dissection (AoD) (Figure 2) for which cardiothoracic surgery emergently performed a successful operative repair of the aortic root. Timely ED detection of the seldom encountered, but highly lethal, condition of thoracic AoD is critical yet challenging given the considerable range of symptomatology.1-5 Our case provides a very rare description of painless AoD presenting as pure TGA, which has only been communicated in a few previous reports.6-12 Emergency physicians should specifically recognize thoracic AoD as a potential underlying etiology of TGA-like syndromes. The use of FOCUS in evaluating undifferentiated hypotension and a multitude of cardiovascular emergencies including AoD has been well-described.13, 14 Importantly, our case also illustrates an invaluable role for sonographic assessment of the thoracic aorta arch from the suprasternal notch window if AoD is suspected.15, 16 This report highlights a unique application of emergency physician-performed FOCUS to expedite the prompt bedside diagnosis of AoD in ED patients presenting with TGA. This research was supported in part by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians OpenSame topicAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesFrench-language works237,207