Bedside echocardiography evaluation of a male with transient global amnesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 50-year-old male with a history of hypertension, migraines, chronic back pain, and tobacco use presented to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of altered mentation. His wife reported that he suddenly became confused with short-term memory loss and was repeating questions after his morning cigarette. He denied head trauma, headache, vision changes, speech changes, weakness, or sensation loss to the extremities, chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, syncope, abdominal pain, or atypical back pain. Vital signs were within normal limits, except for initial blood pressure of 93/51 mm Hg. On physical examination, the patient was awake, alert, disoriented to time and place, and notable for global amnesia, however, there were no focal neurological deficits otherwise. The patient underwent emergent computed tomography (CT) brain imaging and neurology evaluation. Underlying intracranial bleed or acute ischemic stroke was ruled out. Neurology deemed the clinical presentation most consistent with transient global amnesia (TGA). Electrocardiogram revealed normal sinus rhythm without acute ischemic changes. All laboratory studies, which included cardiac biomarkers and urine drug screen, were within normal limits or negative. Bedside focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) was performed to evaluate for a potential cardiovascular etiology due to hypotension; FOCUS demonstrated a dilated proximal thoracic aorta diameter of 4.6 cm in the parasternal long-axis window and an aortic dissection flap visualized in the suprasternal notch window (Figure 1). CT angiography of the chest subsequently confirmed the diagnosis of type A aortic dissection (AoD) (Figure 2) for which cardiothoracic surgery emergently performed a successful operative repair of the aortic root. Timely ED detection of the seldom encountered, but highly lethal, condition of thoracic AoD is critical yet challenging given the considerable range of symptomatology.1-5 Our case provides a very rare description of painless AoD presenting as pure TGA, which has only been communicated in a few previous reports.6-12 Emergency physicians should specifically recognize thoracic AoD as a potential underlying etiology of TGA-like syndromes. The use of FOCUS in evaluating undifferentiated hypotension and a multitude of cardiovascular emergencies including AoD has been well-described.13, 14 Importantly, our case also illustrates an invaluable role for sonographic assessment of the thoracic aorta arch from the suprasternal notch window if AoD is suspected.15, 16 This report highlights a unique application of emergency physician-performed FOCUS to expedite the prompt bedside diagnosis of AoD in ED patients presenting with TGA. This research was supported in part by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".