MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4225678575 · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000002574.05

PD26-05 HOW LONG SHOULD WE FOLLOW LOW GRADE TA NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER (NMIBC)? A LARGE RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE INSTITUTION ANALYSIS

2022· article· en· W4225678575 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eunice Villegas, Christian Vitug, Katherine Lajkosz, Cynthia Kuk, Bruce Gao, Otto Hemminiki, Dhiral Kot, Shayan Din, Jimmy Misurka, Girish S. Kulkarni, Michael A.S. Jewett, Neil Fleshner, Theodorus van der Kwast, Alexandre R. Zlotta

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Urology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiscontinuationMedicineBladder cancerGeneral surgeryClassicsCancerInternal medicineHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD26-05 HOW LONG SHOULD WE FOLLOW LOW GRADE TA NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER (NMIBC)? A LARGE RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE INSTITUTION ANALYSIS Eunice Villegas, Christian Vitug, Katherine Lajkosz, Cynthia Kuk, Bruce Gao, Otto Hemminiki, Dhiral Kot, Shayan Din, Jimmy Misurka, Girish S. Kulkarni, Michael Jewett, Neil E. Fleshner, Theodorus H. van der Kwast, and Alexandre R. Zlotta Eunice VillegasEunice Villegas More articles by this author , Christian VitugChristian Vitug More articles by this author , Katherine LajkoszKatherine Lajkosz More articles by this author , Cynthia KukCynthia Kuk More articles by this author , Bruce GaoBruce Gao More articles by this author , Otto HemminikiOtto Hemminiki More articles by this author , Dhiral KotDhiral Kot More articles by this author , Shayan DinShayan Din More articles by this author , Jimmy MisurkaJimmy Misurka More articles by this author , Girish S. KulkarniGirish S. Kulkarni More articles by this author , Michael JewettMichael Jewett More articles by this author , Neil E. FleshnerNeil E. Fleshner More articles by this author , Theodorus H. van der KwastTheodorus H. van der Kwast More articles by this author , and Alexandre R. ZlottaAlexandre R. Zlotta More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002574.05AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Over 50% of Ta low grade (LG) NMIBC will recur during long-term follow up but only a few percent will experience stage progression, metastases and death due to BC. For patients with TaLG NMIBC free of recurrence for 10 years, discontinuation of routine cystoscopic surveillance or replacement with urinary markers and/or ultrasonography has been considered as the recurrence rate drops after 5 years. We investigated the long-term follow-up of TaLG NMIBC to further define the length of monitoring. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 529 patients with primary TaLG NMIBC diagnosed between 1989-2019 and followed until 2021 using patient records and the Bladder Cancer Informatics System at the University Health Network, Canada. We assessed the risk of progression to high grade Ta/T1 NMIBC, progression to muscle-invasive disease, metastasis and risk of death due to BC at 5, 10 and 15 years using cumulative incidence functions. Non-BC death served as a competing risk for death due to BC, and all-cause death served as a competing risk for all other outcomes. RESULTS: Among 529 patients (73% men, median age 67.5 years), 360 (68%) recurred, 50(9%) progressed in stage, 20 (4%) developed metastases and 15 (3%) died from BC. Median follow-up was 9.4 years. 312/360 (87%) patients recurred within the first 5 years. Of the 217 patients who did not recur within the first 5 years, 11 died due to non BC related causes. Of the remaining patients, 48 (9% of the entire cohort) recurred. 36 patients (free of recurrence in the first 5 years) recurred within 10 years of their diagnosis, 9 recurred between 10-15 years and 3 between 15-20 years. Of the 15 patients who succumbed to BC (median 9.6 years; IQR3.6-14.8 years) despite presenting initially with TaLG disease, 80% were men, 10% had associated CIS, 67% had multiple tumors and 80% had tumors <3 cm. The actuarial CSS were 99%, 97% and 96% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively, whereas the progression to MIBC or metastases was 3, 5 and 6% at 5, 10 and 15 years. Limitations include the retrospective analysis and results obtained in a tertiary referral center might not be generalizable. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance of patients with TaLG NMIBC should definitely be continued beyond 5 years of follow-up and probably even beyond 10 years. Even after being free of recurrence for 5 years, about 10% of patients will recur. Although the risk is low, about 3% of patients presenting with TaLG NMIBC will eventually die from the disease, most in the intermediate risk category. The term “cancer” for TLGa NMIBC should therefore be kept in our opinion. Source of Funding: N/A © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e489 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Eunice Villegas More articles by this author Christian Vitug More articles by this author Katherine Lajkosz More articles by this author Cynthia Kuk More articles by this author Bruce Gao More articles by this author Otto Hemminiki More articles by this author Dhiral Kot More articles by this author Shayan Din More articles by this author Jimmy Misurka More articles by this author Girish S. Kulkarni More articles by this author Michael Jewett More articles by this author Neil E. Fleshner More articles by this author Theodorus H. van der Kwast More articles by this author Alexandre R. Zlotta More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of UrologyMême sujetBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207