MO151: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Versus Standard of Care for Hyperkalaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Phase 4 Continuity Study Design and Rationale
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Individuals hospitalized with hyperkalaemia (HK) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at very high risk of HK recurrence, which often requires hospital re-admission [1]. Recurrent HK events have a significant impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs [2]. Several approaches, such as reduction in dietary potassium (K+), reduction or discontinuation of diuretic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi), or oral K+ binders may be used to manage HK in the outpatient setting. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is an orally administered, non-absorbed, highly selective K+ binder approved for the treatment of HK in adults. In phase 3 trials, after achieving normokalaemia (NK), individualized once-daily SZC therapy maintained normal range serum K+ levels for up to 1 year in adult outpatients [3]. However, it is unknown if SZC prevents HK recurrence compared with standard of care (SoC). Here, we present the rationale and design of the phase 4 CONTINUITY study (D9480C00023), which will compare the efficacy of continued SZC treatment, as part of the post-discharge medication regimen, with SoC, in maintaining NK and reducing HK-related hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits. METHOD CONTINUITY is a randomized controlled, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study in participants with CKD treated for HK while in hospital, to be conducted in 30–50 study sites across four to seven European countries. The study will comprise both an in-hospital and an outpatient (post-discharge) phase (Figure). During the in-hospital phase, all participants will be treated with SZC to correct HK (SZC 10 g three times daily, up to 72 h) and maintain NK (SZC from 5 g every other day to 10 g once daily) as per local label for 2–14 days. At discharge, participants with NK established on an SZC maintenance dose will be randomised (1:1) to either SZC per local label (Arm A) or SoC per local practice (Arm B); participants intended to be discharged with a K+ binder will not be randomized and will be discontinued from the study. Following randomization, participants enter the outpatient phase and will be monitored for 180 days post-discharge via seven planned follow-up visits or phone calls, followed by a site visit at 7 days after end of treatment (Figure). Participants will be screened to yield 506 entering the in-hospital phase, resulting in 430 participants discharged and randomized (215 per arm) and 344 evaluable participants. Adults (≥18 years) with stage 3b–5 CKD or eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at or within 3 months prior to study screening, who are admitted to hospital with a serum K+ of 5.5–6.5 mmol/L, will be eligible. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of NK (serum K+ 3.5–5.0 mmol/L) at 180 days post-discharge. Secondary and exploratory outcomes assessed within 180 days post-discharge include a composite endpoint of any HK-related hospital admission or ED visit, use of rescue therapy for HK and all-cause death, as well as RAASi treatment status and dose, and K+ level. Safety and tolerability will also be evaluated. CONCLUSION CONTINUITY is the first study to examine the efficacy of extended use of a novel K+ binder post-discharge compared with SoC, on the maintenance of NK and reduced HCRU among patients with HK, with CKD stage 3b–5. This study will address the importance of maintaining NK after discharge in routine clinical practice, and the impact of improved management of patients with CKD and HK.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».