MO151: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Versus Standard of Care for Hyperkalaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Phase 4 Continuity Study Design and Rationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Individuals hospitalized with hyperkalaemia (HK) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at very high risk of HK recurrence, which often requires hospital re-admission [1]. Recurrent HK events have a significant impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs [2]. Several approaches, such as reduction in dietary potassium (K+), reduction or discontinuation of diuretic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi), or oral K+ binders may be used to manage HK in the outpatient setting. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is an orally administered, non-absorbed, highly selective K+ binder approved for the treatment of HK in adults. In phase 3 trials, after achieving normokalaemia (NK), individualized once-daily SZC therapy maintained normal range serum K+ levels for up to 1 year in adult outpatients [3]. However, it is unknown if SZC prevents HK recurrence compared with standard of care (SoC). Here, we present the rationale and design of the phase 4 CONTINUITY study (D9480C00023), which will compare the efficacy of continued SZC treatment, as part of the post-discharge medication regimen, with SoC, in maintaining NK and reducing HK-related hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits. METHOD CONTINUITY is a randomized controlled, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study in participants with CKD treated for HK while in hospital, to be conducted in 30–50 study sites across four to seven European countries. The study will comprise both an in-hospital and an outpatient (post-discharge) phase (Figure). During the in-hospital phase, all participants will be treated with SZC to correct HK (SZC 10 g three times daily, up to 72 h) and maintain NK (SZC from 5 g every other day to 10 g once daily) as per local label for 2–14 days. At discharge, participants with NK established on an SZC maintenance dose will be randomised (1:1) to either SZC per local label (Arm A) or SoC per local practice (Arm B); participants intended to be discharged with a K+ binder will not be randomized and will be discontinued from the study. Following randomization, participants enter the outpatient phase and will be monitored for 180 days post-discharge via seven planned follow-up visits or phone calls, followed by a site visit at 7 days after end of treatment (Figure). Participants will be screened to yield 506 entering the in-hospital phase, resulting in 430 participants discharged and randomized (215 per arm) and 344 evaluable participants. Adults (≥18 years) with stage 3b–5 CKD or eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at or within 3 months prior to study screening, who are admitted to hospital with a serum K+ of 5.5–6.5 mmol/L, will be eligible. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of NK (serum K+ 3.5–5.0 mmol/L) at 180 days post-discharge. Secondary and exploratory outcomes assessed within 180 days post-discharge include a composite endpoint of any HK-related hospital admission or ED visit, use of rescue therapy for HK and all-cause death, as well as RAASi treatment status and dose, and K+ level. Safety and tolerability will also be evaluated. CONCLUSION CONTINUITY is the first study to examine the efficacy of extended use of a novel K+ binder post-discharge compared with SoC, on the maintenance of NK and reduced HCRU among patients with HK, with CKD stage 3b–5. This study will address the importance of maintaining NK after discharge in routine clinical practice, and the impact of improved management of patients with CKD and HK.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".