MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4231553361 · doi:10.2523/86512-ms

Application and Performance of Single-Trip, Multi-zone, High-Rate Water Packs in a Mature Low-Pressure, Low-Temperature Gas Field

2004· article· en· W4231553361 sur OpenAlexaff
Lewis Ledlow, Brian T. Seitz

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensConocoPhillips (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesConocoPhillips
Mots-clésExhibitionCitationComputer scienceWorld Wide WebArchaeologyGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Application and Performance of Single-Trip, Multi-zone, High-Rate Water Packs in a Mature Low-Pressure, Low-Temperature Gas Field Lewis B. Ledlow; Lewis B. Ledlow ConocoPhillips Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Brian T. Seitz Brian T. Seitz ConocoPhillips Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, February 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86512-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86512-MS Published: February 18 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ledlow, Lewis B., and Brian T. Seitz. "Application and Performance of Single-Trip, Multi-zone, High-Rate Water Packs in a Mature Low-Pressure, Low-Temperature Gas Field." Paper presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, February 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86512-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control Search Advanced Search AbstractA total of six high rate water packs were installed in two wells utilizing a single trip, multi-zone gravel pack technique. The multi-zone gravel pack tool system allowed the installation of multiple gravel packs with a single run into the wellbore.1,2,3 This gravel pack system was chosen to reduce rig time and to minimize fluid loss into the low pressure, high permeability gas sands. In this high permeability reservoir, frac packing did not appear necessary for stimulation. The multi-layered reservoir and low strength rock made it highly unlikely that single, planar fractures could be created that would grow and connect up all the individual sands. Emphasis was placed on completion efficiency to minimize the effects of non-Darcy flow that severely limit the productivity of conventionally completed wells.This paper describes the nodal analysis and well test evaluation techniques used to assess the rate limiting effects and completion inefficiencies of existing completions in this field. Also presented are single-trip, multi-zone gravel pack completion design and installation techniques that provided two to five times the productivity over conventional completions in a mature, low pressure, low temperature gas field. Sustained deliverability from the two completed wells has deferred both rig and non-rig wellwork for several years.IntroductionThe Beluga River gas field is an onshore development located 32 miles west of Anchorage, Alaska, along the northwest shoreline of Cook Inlet (Figure 1). Access to the Beluga River Field is by air or water. There are no roads connecting the field to the highway road system. The shallow gas accumulation was discovered in 1962 while exploring for a deeper oil objective. The field was first put on production in 1968 and is a significant supplier of gas used for power generation and space heating around the major population centers of south-central Alaska. With a customer base primarily consisting of the utility market in a seasonal cold weather environment, the field has historically been a provider of high swing gas, with monthly average winter rates exceeding the summer demand by a factor of more than two (Figure 2). Daily fluctuations in demand are even greater. With no gas storage available, swings in gas supply throughout the region are provided via the wellbore.The Beluga River Unit produces from the Sterling and Beluga formations over a gross interval of 3000'.4 Encased in relatively impermeable siltstones and mudstones, individual sands range from 5' to 50' thick (Figure 3). The interbedded coals sourced the large volumes of biogenic gas trapped within the field and the reservoir gas consists of 99.5% methane. No hydrocarbon liquids are produced. Original reservoir pressure in the Sterling formation was 1635 psia with a temperature of 94°F at 3300' TVDSS. By the time this work was performed in 1998, the reservoir pressure had declined to 1163 psia. Permabilities measured from core can vary up to two orders of magnitude but on average exceed 100 md.This paper focuses on the Pliocene age Sterling formation that ranges in depth from 3,000' to 4000' TVDSS. These high permeability, gas-charged sandstones are friable, matrix clay rich, with minimal cementation. Rate restrictions are imposed on conventionally completed wells to minimize sand production. When water breakthrough occurs, sand production is uncontrollable regardless of rate. Non-Darcy flow effects associated with gas production from this low pressure reservoir cause significant near wellbore drawdown. These non-Darcy flow effects and the resultant pressure drop near the wellbore limit the rate at which conventionally completed wells can be produced sand free. Keywords: volumetric measurement, flow rate, perforation, reservoir pressure, mscfd, low pressure, high rate water pack, psia, gas field, low temperature gas field Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Perforating, Completion Installation and Operations, Completion Operations This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,181
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→