MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231553361 · doi:10.2523/86512-ms

Application and Performance of Single-Trip, Multi-zone, High-Rate Water Packs in a Mature Low-Pressure, Low-Temperature Gas Field

2004· article· en· W4231553361 on OpenAlexaff
Lewis Ledlow, Brian T. Seitz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsExhibitionCitationComputer scienceWorld Wide WebArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Application and Performance of Single-Trip, Multi-zone, High-Rate Water Packs in a Mature Low-Pressure, Low-Temperature Gas Field Lewis B. Ledlow; Lewis B. Ledlow ConocoPhillips Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Brian T. Seitz Brian T. Seitz ConocoPhillips Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, February 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86512-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86512-MS Published: February 18 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ledlow, Lewis B., and Brian T. Seitz. "Application and Performance of Single-Trip, Multi-zone, High-Rate Water Packs in a Mature Low-Pressure, Low-Temperature Gas Field." Paper presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, February 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86512-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control Search Advanced Search AbstractA total of six high rate water packs were installed in two wells utilizing a single trip, multi-zone gravel pack technique. The multi-zone gravel pack tool system allowed the installation of multiple gravel packs with a single run into the wellbore.1,2,3 This gravel pack system was chosen to reduce rig time and to minimize fluid loss into the low pressure, high permeability gas sands. In this high permeability reservoir, frac packing did not appear necessary for stimulation. The multi-layered reservoir and low strength rock made it highly unlikely that single, planar fractures could be created that would grow and connect up all the individual sands. Emphasis was placed on completion efficiency to minimize the effects of non-Darcy flow that severely limit the productivity of conventionally completed wells.This paper describes the nodal analysis and well test evaluation techniques used to assess the rate limiting effects and completion inefficiencies of existing completions in this field. Also presented are single-trip, multi-zone gravel pack completion design and installation techniques that provided two to five times the productivity over conventional completions in a mature, low pressure, low temperature gas field. Sustained deliverability from the two completed wells has deferred both rig and non-rig wellwork for several years.IntroductionThe Beluga River gas field is an onshore development located 32 miles west of Anchorage, Alaska, along the northwest shoreline of Cook Inlet (Figure 1). Access to the Beluga River Field is by air or water. There are no roads connecting the field to the highway road system. The shallow gas accumulation was discovered in 1962 while exploring for a deeper oil objective. The field was first put on production in 1968 and is a significant supplier of gas used for power generation and space heating around the major population centers of south-central Alaska. With a customer base primarily consisting of the utility market in a seasonal cold weather environment, the field has historically been a provider of high swing gas, with monthly average winter rates exceeding the summer demand by a factor of more than two (Figure 2). Daily fluctuations in demand are even greater. With no gas storage available, swings in gas supply throughout the region are provided via the wellbore.The Beluga River Unit produces from the Sterling and Beluga formations over a gross interval of 3000'.4 Encased in relatively impermeable siltstones and mudstones, individual sands range from 5' to 50' thick (Figure 3). The interbedded coals sourced the large volumes of biogenic gas trapped within the field and the reservoir gas consists of 99.5% methane. No hydrocarbon liquids are produced. Original reservoir pressure in the Sterling formation was 1635 psia with a temperature of 94°F at 3300' TVDSS. By the time this work was performed in 1998, the reservoir pressure had declined to 1163 psia. Permabilities measured from core can vary up to two orders of magnitude but on average exceed 100 md.This paper focuses on the Pliocene age Sterling formation that ranges in depth from 3,000' to 4000' TVDSS. These high permeability, gas-charged sandstones are friable, matrix clay rich, with minimal cementation. Rate restrictions are imposed on conventionally completed wells to minimize sand production. When water breakthrough occurs, sand production is uncontrollable regardless of rate. Non-Darcy flow effects associated with gas production from this low pressure reservoir cause significant near wellbore drawdown. These non-Darcy flow effects and the resultant pressure drop near the wellbore limit the rate at which conventionally completed wells can be produced sand free. Keywords: volumetric measurement, flow rate, perforation, reservoir pressure, mscfd, low pressure, high rate water pack, psia, gas field, low temperature gas field Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Perforating, Completion Installation and Operations, Completion Operations This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→