MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4233439017 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab76

76 CLONED HORSE PREGNANCIES PRODUCED USING ADULT CUMULUS CELLS

2004· article· en· W4233439017 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Dirk K. Vanderwall, G.L. Woods, Kenneth I. Aston, Thomas D. Bunch, G.-P. Li, Lora N. Meerdo, K.L. White

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueReproductive Biology and Fertility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Mots-clésFoalAndrologyHorseEmbryo transferOviductBiologyGynecologyEmbryoMedicineCell biology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We recently reported the birth of the first clone of an equine species, a mule, which was produced using a fetal fibroblast cell line (Woods GL et al., 2003 Science 301, 1063). Since the birth of the first foal, two more identical cloned mule foals have been born. All three foals were delivered spontaneously without assistance, and have been healthy and vigorous since birth. Even more recently, the birth of a horse foal cloned from an adult fibroblast cell line was reported (Touchette N, 2003 Nature 424, 635). Despite these successes, the efficiency of equine nuclear transfer (NT) continues to be very low. The objective of this study was to use NT to clone adult horses using cumulus cells. Cumulus-oocyte complexes used for NT were obtained using transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration (TVA) 24 hrs after hCG treatment; oocytes were used as cytoplasts, while cumulus cells (from one of three different mares) were used as donor cells. Cumulus cells were recovered from TVA fluid, washed two times by suspension in PB1 medium (Whittingham DG, 1974 J. Reprod. Fertil. 37, 159–162), followed by centrifugation (200g) and placement in Glasgow MEM BHK-21 containing 10% FBS. Nuclear transfer procedures were performed as described (Woods GL et al., 2003 Science 301, 1063). Immediately following NT and activation procedures, cloned embryos were surgically transferred to the oviduct of recipient mares (n = 2 to 5 embryos/recipient) that had ovulated within 24 hrs prior to the transfer. An initial pregnancy examination was performed between Days 14 and 16 (Day 0 = surgery); subsequent examinations were then performed at approximately weekly intervals. A total of 136 follicles were aspirated in 96 mares, from which 72 oocytes were recovered (53%). Sixty-two cloned embryos were subsequently transferred to recipient mares, which resulted in 7 (11.3%) ultrasonographically-detectable pregnancies. Cumulus cells from Mare 160 tended (P = 0.08) to result in more pregnancies than cumulus cells from Mare 221 (4/17 v. 1/25, respectively). All seven cloned pregnancies underwent spontaneous pregnancy loss between Days 16 and 80. An embryo-proper and heartbeat were detected in three conceptuses. Of four conceptuses in which an embryo-proper was not observed, three did not develop past Day 24; therefore, they were lost before the time at which an embryo-proper generally becomes readily apparent. One conceptus developed to Day 28, yet still failed to form an embryo-proper. There were no premonitory signs of impending embryonic loss in the conceptuses that did not develop an embryo-proper; the conceptus was simply not evident at the subsequent examination. Signs of impending embryonic loss were observed in the three conceptuses in which an embryo-proper was observed, and included: (1) loss of embryonic heartbeat, (2) disorganization of the conceptus membranes, and (3) increased echogenicity of conceptus fluids. One or more of these signs were observed in all three conceptuses prior to pregnancy loss. To our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the establishment of cloned horse pregnancies produced using adult cumulus cells.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentMême sujetReproductive Biology and FertilityTravaux en français237 207