MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233439017 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab76

76 CLONED HORSE PREGNANCIES PRODUCED USING ADULT CUMULUS CELLS

2004· article· en· W4233439017 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dirk K. Vanderwall, G.L. Woods, Kenneth I. Aston, Thomas D. Bunch, G.-P. Li, Lora N. Meerdo, K.L. White

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsFoalAndrologyHorseEmbryo transferOviductBiologyGynecologyEmbryoMedicineCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We recently reported the birth of the first clone of an equine species, a mule, which was produced using a fetal fibroblast cell line (Woods GL et al., 2003 Science 301, 1063). Since the birth of the first foal, two more identical cloned mule foals have been born. All three foals were delivered spontaneously without assistance, and have been healthy and vigorous since birth. Even more recently, the birth of a horse foal cloned from an adult fibroblast cell line was reported (Touchette N, 2003 Nature 424, 635). Despite these successes, the efficiency of equine nuclear transfer (NT) continues to be very low. The objective of this study was to use NT to clone adult horses using cumulus cells. Cumulus-oocyte complexes used for NT were obtained using transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration (TVA) 24 hrs after hCG treatment; oocytes were used as cytoplasts, while cumulus cells (from one of three different mares) were used as donor cells. Cumulus cells were recovered from TVA fluid, washed two times by suspension in PB1 medium (Whittingham DG, 1974 J. Reprod. Fertil. 37, 159–162), followed by centrifugation (200g) and placement in Glasgow MEM BHK-21 containing 10% FBS. Nuclear transfer procedures were performed as described (Woods GL et al., 2003 Science 301, 1063). Immediately following NT and activation procedures, cloned embryos were surgically transferred to the oviduct of recipient mares (n = 2 to 5 embryos/recipient) that had ovulated within 24 hrs prior to the transfer. An initial pregnancy examination was performed between Days 14 and 16 (Day 0 = surgery); subsequent examinations were then performed at approximately weekly intervals. A total of 136 follicles were aspirated in 96 mares, from which 72 oocytes were recovered (53%). Sixty-two cloned embryos were subsequently transferred to recipient mares, which resulted in 7 (11.3%) ultrasonographically-detectable pregnancies. Cumulus cells from Mare 160 tended (P = 0.08) to result in more pregnancies than cumulus cells from Mare 221 (4/17 v. 1/25, respectively). All seven cloned pregnancies underwent spontaneous pregnancy loss between Days 16 and 80. An embryo-proper and heartbeat were detected in three conceptuses. Of four conceptuses in which an embryo-proper was not observed, three did not develop past Day 24; therefore, they were lost before the time at which an embryo-proper generally becomes readily apparent. One conceptus developed to Day 28, yet still failed to form an embryo-proper. There were no premonitory signs of impending embryonic loss in the conceptuses that did not develop an embryo-proper; the conceptus was simply not evident at the subsequent examination. Signs of impending embryonic loss were observed in the three conceptuses in which an embryo-proper was observed, and included: (1) loss of embryonic heartbeat, (2) disorganization of the conceptus membranes, and (3) increased echogenicity of conceptus fluids. One or more of these signs were observed in all three conceptuses prior to pregnancy loss. To our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the establishment of cloned horse pregnancies produced using adult cumulus cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207