MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4233543273 · doi:10.2523/86585-ms

An Integrated Approach to Impact Assessment

2004· article· en· W4233543273 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Macklin, Jan Hartog

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueNatural Resources and Economic Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationExhibitionOpenness to experienceEnvironmental impact assessmentLibrary scienceDownloadSustainabilityComputer scienceCitation impactBusinessPolitical scienceWorld Wide WebPsychologyLawGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

An Integrated Approach to Impact Assessment Stephen Macklin; Stephen Macklin Shell International Exploration and Production B.V. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jan J. Hartog Jan J. Hartog Shell International Exploration and Production B.V. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86585-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86585-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Macklin, Stephen, and Jan J. Hartog. "An Integrated Approach to Impact Assessment." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86585-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractImpact Assessment is continuously developing both in process and in application. Increasingly society expects that business should make a broader contribution to it. This has translated in impact assessment to spending more effort on enhancing benefits as well as mitigating the negative impact of our activities. Society is also expecting more openness and transparency, with greater communication and engagement on issues throughout the impact assessment process.New developments in impact assessment include increasing attention to social, health and biodiversity impacts, and integrating environmental, social and health aspects. Increasingly attention is being given to integrating impact assessment within the project/business processes and integrating the results of the impact assessment into project/business execution. Furthermore, impact assessments are being applied to an increasing range of projects, as well as to earlier phases of decision-making such as country entry. Also, Strategic Environmental Assessment is emerging as a new regulatory requirement in some areas of the world.The paper will outline the recent developments within and key challenges faced by Shell EP, and the key features of its new integrated impact assessment approach. Of particular note will be how biodiversity and health are addressed in the impact assessment process.ProposalShell International Exploration and Production B.V. (SIEP) have developed an integrated approach to impact assessment, which means several things:Integrating environment, social (economic) and health aspects within the impact assessment process.Integrating the impact assessment process with the project/business opportunity realisation process.Integrating impact assessment as a cross functional activity within the project /business processes.Looking at issues raised by projects that are also important outside of the project scope, in the overall context of both the host society and international interest.Integrating Environment, Social (Economic) and Health Aspects within the Impact Assessment ProcessOur business decisions have the potential to influence many different conditions in the places in which we operate: the quality and diversity of the natural environment, the economic and cultural welfare of communities, and the health of people.Integrating environment, social and health aspects starts with a holistic approach to the definition of environment. This means defining the environment as a set of natural and human features which exist in a given place and point of time. The environment can be thought of as comprising the physical, biological and human environment.The physical environment (also known as the abiotic environment) - everything in nature that is not living, including human induced changes in physical and chemical environmental properties and physical structures.The biological environment - essentially all life on earth and the systems that support it. More specifically, the Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992 (CBD), defines biodiversity as "the variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part. This includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems".The human environment - a set of human features that exist in a given place and point of time - man-made systems and structures including social and economic systems, health, and cultural/heritage resources. Keywords: social impact assessment, application, assessment, social responsibility, stakeholder, sustainability, information, health aspect, assessment process, health & medicine Subjects: Health, Sustainability/Social Responsibility, Environmental and social impact assessments This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,823
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,496

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,057
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and ProductionMême sujetNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207