Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Integrated Approach to Impact Assessment Stephen Macklin; Stephen Macklin Shell International Exploration and Production B.V. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jan J. Hartog Jan J. Hartog Shell International Exploration and Production B.V. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86585-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86585-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Macklin, Stephen, and Jan J. Hartog. "An Integrated Approach to Impact Assessment." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86585-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractImpact Assessment is continuously developing both in process and in application. Increasingly society expects that business should make a broader contribution to it. This has translated in impact assessment to spending more effort on enhancing benefits as well as mitigating the negative impact of our activities. Society is also expecting more openness and transparency, with greater communication and engagement on issues throughout the impact assessment process.New developments in impact assessment include increasing attention to social, health and biodiversity impacts, and integrating environmental, social and health aspects. Increasingly attention is being given to integrating impact assessment within the project/business processes and integrating the results of the impact assessment into project/business execution. Furthermore, impact assessments are being applied to an increasing range of projects, as well as to earlier phases of decision-making such as country entry. Also, Strategic Environmental Assessment is emerging as a new regulatory requirement in some areas of the world.The paper will outline the recent developments within and key challenges faced by Shell EP, and the key features of its new integrated impact assessment approach. Of particular note will be how biodiversity and health are addressed in the impact assessment process.ProposalShell International Exploration and Production B.V. (SIEP) have developed an integrated approach to impact assessment, which means several things:Integrating environment, social (economic) and health aspects within the impact assessment process.Integrating the impact assessment process with the project/business opportunity realisation process.Integrating impact assessment as a cross functional activity within the project /business processes.Looking at issues raised by projects that are also important outside of the project scope, in the overall context of both the host society and international interest.Integrating Environment, Social (Economic) and Health Aspects within the Impact Assessment ProcessOur business decisions have the potential to influence many different conditions in the places in which we operate: the quality and diversity of the natural environment, the economic and cultural welfare of communities, and the health of people.Integrating environment, social and health aspects starts with a holistic approach to the definition of environment. This means defining the environment as a set of natural and human features which exist in a given place and point of time. The environment can be thought of as comprising the physical, biological and human environment.The physical environment (also known as the abiotic environment) - everything in nature that is not living, including human induced changes in physical and chemical environmental properties and physical structures.The biological environment - essentially all life on earth and the systems that support it. More specifically, the Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992 (CBD), defines biodiversity as "the variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part. This includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems".The human environment - a set of human features that exist in a given place and point of time - man-made systems and structures including social and economic systems, health, and cultural/heritage resources. Keywords: social impact assessment, application, assessment, social responsibility, stakeholder, sustainability, information, health aspect, assessment process, health & medicine Subjects: Health, Sustainability/Social Responsibility, Environmental and social impact assessments This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".