Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Previous articleNext article FreeContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreRichard A. Benton is assistant professor in the School of Labor and Employment Relations at the University of Illinois. His research examines board interlock networks, corporate governance, and elite power.J. Adam Cobb is assistant professor in the Department of Business, Government, and Society at the McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin. His research examines the historical development and reconfiguration of employment relations and their implications.Jeremy E. Fiel is assistant professor of sociology at the University of Arizona. His research uses quantitative methods to examine stratification processes, with particular interests in contemporary school segregation and intergenerational educational stratification.Yongjun Zhang is a sociology Ph.D. candidate at the University of Arizona. His research interests broadly include political sociology, organizational behavior, social inequality, and demography. His current projects use statistical, network, and computational methods to study shareholder activism and corporate political behavior.Alexander E. Kentikelenis is assistant professor of sociology and political economy at Bocconi University. He has published extensively on global governance issues and on the social and political consequences of austerity.Sarah Babb is professor of sociology at Boston College. She is author of Behind the Development Banks (University of Chicago, 2009), as well as other works on international financial institutions and market-liberalizing reforms in developing countries.Craig M. Rawlings is assistant professor of sociology at Duke University and a faculty affiliate of the Duke Network Analysis Center. His work uses relational methods to examine how meanings, ideas, beliefs, and feelings take shape and spread in groups, and the consequences of these processes for social cohesion and fragmentation. His article with Daniel McFarland and Dan Jurafsky on social bonding in courtship rituals won the 2015 AJS Gould Prize.Clayton Childress is assistant professor of sociology at University of Toronto. His work on the creation, production, and reception of culture has been published in American Sociological Review, Poetics, and other venues. His book, Under the Cover: The Creation, Production, and Reception of a Novel (Princeton University Press), was 2018 cowinner of the Mary Douglas Prize for Best Book.Xiang Zhou is assistant professor in the Department of Government at Harvard University. He received a PhD in sociology and statistics from the University of Michigan. His research focuses on social stratification and mobility, quantitative methodology, and contemporary Chinese society. His work has appeared in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Sociological Review, Sociological Methodology and other peer-reviewed journals.Yu Xie is the Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Sociology and the director of the Paul and Marcia Wythes Center on Contemporary China at Princeton University. His main areas of interest are social stratification, demography, statistical methods, Chinese studies, and sociology of science. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 124, Number 6May 2019 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/704332 © 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle