Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Harold Adams Innis (1894–1952) was a Canadian economic historian, political economist, and communication theorist. Born in Otterville, Ontario, he graduated with a BA from McMaster University before serving as a member of the artillery in the Canadian Expeditionary Force in World War I. After suffering an injury near Vimy Ridge in 1917, he convalesced at a series of hospitals in Great Britain completing an MA degree under the auspices of McMaster University and Frontier College. Following his return home, he studied for a PhD in economics at the University of Chicago, graduating in 1920. He was subsequently hired by the Department of Political Economy at the University of Toronto, where he spent his entire academic career (1920–1952). Innis first became known for his studies on how the production of staple products such as fur, fish, lumber, and wheat shaped and directed the path of Canadian economic development. This involved a close examination of the impact of European colonial systems on North America, particularly those of Great Britain, France, Portugal, and Spain. To this end, he was very engaged in what he called “dirt research,” which involved lengthy research visits to resource-producing areas of Canada, particularly in the North. During these trips he made detailed field notes based on observations, social interactions, as well as the collection of primary data (see Autobiographical Material and Major Field Notes). During the 1930s, he became engaged with issues related to bias in the social sciences, as well as to the role universities had played in the development of Western civilization (see Major Essays on Education and Universities). In his later years, he turned his attention to the history of communication, with particular attention given to the relationship between forms of media and broader patterns of power and social control. Innis was closely involved with numerous academic and funding bodies including the Royal Society of Canada, the Canadian Social Science Research Council (see Fisher 1999 under Biographical/Theoretical Works), the Canadian Humanities Research Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Guggenheim Foundation. He served as president of both the Economic History Association and the American Economic Association. Despite his abiding suspicion of academics who participated in the policy process, he was a member of such consultative bodies as the Nova Scotia Royal Commission of Provincial Economic Enquiry (1934) and the Canadian Royal Commission on Transportation (1949–1951). While there is general agreement about his shift in research interest from Canadian economic history to history of communications, there is a decided difference of opinion about the extent to which there was continuity between these two phases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,121 | 0,055 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».