MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Harold Innis

2018· reference-entry· en· W4233725471 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William J. Buxton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierPoliticsDirtArtilleryPolitical scienceEconomic historyHistoryGeographyArchaeologyLawCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harold Adams Innis (1894–1952) was a Canadian economic historian, political economist, and communication theorist. Born in Otterville, Ontario, he graduated with a BA from McMaster University before serving as a member of the artillery in the Canadian Expeditionary Force in World War I. After suffering an injury near Vimy Ridge in 1917, he convalesced at a series of hospitals in Great Britain completing an MA degree under the auspices of McMaster University and Frontier College. Following his return home, he studied for a PhD in economics at the University of Chicago, graduating in 1920. He was subsequently hired by the Department of Political Economy at the University of Toronto, where he spent his entire academic career (1920–1952). Innis first became known for his studies on how the production of staple products such as fur, fish, lumber, and wheat shaped and directed the path of Canadian economic development. This involved a close examination of the impact of European colonial systems on North America, particularly those of Great Britain, France, Portugal, and Spain. To this end, he was very engaged in what he called “dirt research,” which involved lengthy research visits to resource-producing areas of Canada, particularly in the North. During these trips he made detailed field notes based on observations, social interactions, as well as the collection of primary data (see Autobiographical Material and Major Field Notes). During the 1930s, he became engaged with issues related to bias in the social sciences, as well as to the role universities had played in the development of Western civilization (see Major Essays on Education and Universities). In his later years, he turned his attention to the history of communication, with particular attention given to the relationship between forms of media and broader patterns of power and social control. Innis was closely involved with numerous academic and funding bodies including the Royal Society of Canada, the Canadian Social Science Research Council (see Fisher 1999 under Biographical/Theoretical Works), the Canadian Humanities Research Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Guggenheim Foundation. He served as president of both the Economic History Association and the American Economic Association. Despite his abiding suspicion of academics who participated in the policy process, he was a member of such consultative bodies as the Nova Scotia Royal Commission of Provincial Economic Enquiry (1934) and the Canadian Royal Commission on Transportation (1949–1951). While there is general agreement about his shift in research interest from Canadian economic history to history of communications, there is a decided difference of opinion about the extent to which there was continuity between these two phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1210.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→