MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4234275933 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14650071.v1

Modelling surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining using level set methods

2021· preprint· en· W4234275933 sur OpenAlexafffund
Tom Burzynski

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueErosion and Abrasive Machining
Établissements canadiensToronto Metropolitan University
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésJet (fluid)Surface (topology)Surface micromachiningBrittlenessRange (aeronautics)MechanicsAbrasiveMaterials scienceMasking (illustration)Particle (ecology)Computer sciencePhysicsGeometryFabricationMathematicsGeologyComposite material

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The time dependent surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining (AJM) is described by a partial differential equation which is difficult to solve using analytical or traditional numerical techniques. These techniques can yield incorrect predicted profile evolution or fail altogether under certain conditions. More recently developed particle tracking cellular automaton simulations can address some of these limitations but are difficult to implement and are computationally expensive. In this work, level set methods (LSM) were introduced to develop novel surface evolution models to predict resulting feature shapes in AJM. Initially, a LSM-based numerical model was developed to predict the surface evolution of unmasked channels machined at normal and oblique jet impact angles (incidence), as well as masked micro-channels and micro-holes at normal incidence, in both brittle and ductile targets. This model was then extended to allow the prediction of: surface evolution of inclined masked micro-channels made using AJM at oblique incidence, where the developing profiles rapidly become multi-valued necessitating a more complex formulation; mask erosive wear by permitting surface evolution of both the mask and target micro-channels simultaneously at any jet incidence; and surface damage due to secondary particle strikes in brittle target micro-channels resulting from particle mask-to-target and target-to-target ricochets at any jet incidence. For all the models, a general ‘masking’ function was developed by applying previous concepts to model the adjustment to abrasive mass flux incident to the target or mask surfaces to reflect the range of particle sizes that are ‘visible’ to these surfaces. The models were also optimized for computational efficiency using an adaptive Narrow Band LSM scheme. All models were experimentally verified and, where possible, compared against existing models. Generally, good predictive capabilities and improvements over previous attempts in terms of feature prediction or execution time, were observed. The time dependent surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining (AJM) is described by a partial differential equation which is difficult to solve using analytical or traditional numerical techniques. These techniques can yield incorrect predicted profile evolution or fail altogether under certain conditions. More recently developed particle tracking cellular automaton simulations can address some of these limitations but are difficult to implement and are computationally expensive.In this work, level set methods (LSM) were introduced to develop novel surface evolution models to predict resulting feature shapes in AJM. Initially, a LSM-based numerical model was developed to predict the surface evolution of unmasked channels machined at normal and oblique jet impact angles (incidence), as well as masked micro-channels and micro-holes at normal incidence, in both brittle and ductile targets.This model was then extended to allow the prediction of: surface evolution of inclined masked micro-channels made using AJM at oblique incidence, where the developing profiles rapidly become multi-valued necessitating a more complex formulation; mask erosive wear by permitting surface evolution of both the mask and target micro-channels simultaneously at any jet incidence; and surface damage due to secondary particle strikes in brittle target micro-channels resulting from particle mask-to-target and target-to-target ricochets at any jet incidence. For all the models, a general ‘masking’ functionwas developed by applying previous concepts to model the adjustment to abrasive mass flux incident to the target or mask surfaces to reflect the range of particle sizes that are ‘visible’ to these surfaces. The models were also optimized for computational efficiency using an adaptive Narrow Band LSM scheme.All models were experimentally verified and, where possible, compared against existing models. Generally, good predictive capabilities and improvements over previous attempts in terms of feature prediction or execution time, were observed.The proposed LSM-based models can be practical assistive tools during the micro-fabrication of complex MEMS and microfluidic devices using AJM.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,139
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,138
Tête enseignante GPT0,376
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetErosion and Abrasive MachiningTravaux en français237 207