MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234275933 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14650071.v1

Modelling surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining using level set methods

2021· preprint· en· W4234275933 on OpenAlexafffund
Tom Burzynski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicErosion and Abrasive Machining
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJet (fluid)Surface (topology)Surface micromachiningBrittlenessRange (aeronautics)MechanicsAbrasiveMaterials scienceMasking (illustration)Particle (ecology)Computer sciencePhysicsGeometryFabricationMathematicsGeologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time dependent surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining (AJM) is described by a partial differential equation which is difficult to solve using analytical or traditional numerical techniques. These techniques can yield incorrect predicted profile evolution or fail altogether under certain conditions. More recently developed particle tracking cellular automaton simulations can address some of these limitations but are difficult to implement and are computationally expensive. In this work, level set methods (LSM) were introduced to develop novel surface evolution models to predict resulting feature shapes in AJM. Initially, a LSM-based numerical model was developed to predict the surface evolution of unmasked channels machined at normal and oblique jet impact angles (incidence), as well as masked micro-channels and micro-holes at normal incidence, in both brittle and ductile targets. This model was then extended to allow the prediction of: surface evolution of inclined masked micro-channels made using AJM at oblique incidence, where the developing profiles rapidly become multi-valued necessitating a more complex formulation; mask erosive wear by permitting surface evolution of both the mask and target micro-channels simultaneously at any jet incidence; and surface damage due to secondary particle strikes in brittle target micro-channels resulting from particle mask-to-target and target-to-target ricochets at any jet incidence. For all the models, a general ‘masking’ function was developed by applying previous concepts to model the adjustment to abrasive mass flux incident to the target or mask surfaces to reflect the range of particle sizes that are ‘visible’ to these surfaces. The models were also optimized for computational efficiency using an adaptive Narrow Band LSM scheme. All models were experimentally verified and, where possible, compared against existing models. Generally, good predictive capabilities and improvements over previous attempts in terms of feature prediction or execution time, were observed. The time dependent surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining (AJM) is described by a partial differential equation which is difficult to solve using analytical or traditional numerical techniques. These techniques can yield incorrect predicted profile evolution or fail altogether under certain conditions. More recently developed particle tracking cellular automaton simulations can address some of these limitations but are difficult to implement and are computationally expensive.In this work, level set methods (LSM) were introduced to develop novel surface evolution models to predict resulting feature shapes in AJM. Initially, a LSM-based numerical model was developed to predict the surface evolution of unmasked channels machined at normal and oblique jet impact angles (incidence), as well as masked micro-channels and micro-holes at normal incidence, in both brittle and ductile targets.This model was then extended to allow the prediction of: surface evolution of inclined masked micro-channels made using AJM at oblique incidence, where the developing profiles rapidly become multi-valued necessitating a more complex formulation; mask erosive wear by permitting surface evolution of both the mask and target micro-channels simultaneously at any jet incidence; and surface damage due to secondary particle strikes in brittle target micro-channels resulting from particle mask-to-target and target-to-target ricochets at any jet incidence. For all the models, a general ‘masking’ functionwas developed by applying previous concepts to model the adjustment to abrasive mass flux incident to the target or mask surfaces to reflect the range of particle sizes that are ‘visible’ to these surfaces. The models were also optimized for computational efficiency using an adaptive Narrow Band LSM scheme.All models were experimentally verified and, where possible, compared against existing models. Generally, good predictive capabilities and improvements over previous attempts in terms of feature prediction or execution time, were observed.The proposed LSM-based models can be practical assistive tools during the micro-fabrication of complex MEMS and microfluidic devices using AJM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicErosion and Abrasive MachiningFrench-language works237,207