MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4234437906 · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.1866_3.x

Owl Update

2004· article· en· W4234437906 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeff N. Davis

Notice bibliographique

RevueConservation Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAvian ecology and behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThreatened speciesIUCN Red ListGeographyConservation-dependent speciesHabitatEcologyDeforestation (computer science)Conservation statusExtinction (optical mineralogy)Habitat destructionPredationNear-threatened speciesConservation biologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ecology and Conservation of Owls. Newton, I., R. Kavanagh, J. Olsen, and I. Taylor, editors. 2002. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia. 378 pp. (363 + xv). AU$99.00 or ∼U.S.$68.00 (paperback). ISBN 0–643067949. Owls are a focal point of conservation worldwide. Several, such as the Spotted Owl of North America and the Powerful Owl of Australia, require large amounts of forest with old-growth features, traits that make them vulnerable to logging and deforestation. Because many owls are top predators with large home ranges and demanding habitat requirements and are charismatic and photogenic, conservation planners often have used them as proxies for the forest ecosystems upon which they depend. A large number of the world's owls are at risk to some degree. According to the World Conservation Union's (IUCN) 2003 Red List of Threatened Species, 27 (13%) of the 204 species of owls known to be alive today are in danger of extinction and another 20 (9.8%) are considered near-threatened. Also, because it is difficult to determine species limits in some groups of owls, an unknown number of species yet to be recognized formally also are likely in jeopardy (del Hoyo et al. 1999). Because most owls are nocturnal and otherwise secretive, we know little about them, particularly when it comes to assessing their conservation status or the effects of habitat alterations. Lamentably, some owls may become extinct before we learn even the most rudimentary aspects of their life histories. On the other hand, there has been so much interest in others, such as the Spotted Owl, that they easily rank among the most intensively studied birds in the world. Yet even for these species, some have argued that we are only beginning to accumulate enough demographic data to develop effective conservation strategies (Verner 1992). Thus, it should come as no surprise that the situation for other owls, including the most endangered ones, is far worse. Our understanding of owls of the Southern Hemisphere in particular is woefully incomplete. However, this exceptional book makes significant strides toward rectifying that situation. Ecology and Conservation of Owls is a well-edited and peer-reviewed collection of contributions by some of the world's leading owl researchers. The book is a product of the third international symposium on owls, which was held in Canberra, Australia, in 2000. It offers a tremendous amount of new information, especially on Australian owls, plus several insightful reviews of previous research covering a wide range of topics and species. Like any symposium volume, this one is not an exhaustive survey of current knowledge, but rather a compilation of papers presented at a meeting. Aside from being grouped together in one of the four general sections, which have no introductions, the contributions are independent of one another. It contains 32 papers organized into four parts: (1) population ecology; (2) distribution, habitat, and diet; (3) conservation and management; and (4) voice, structure, and taxonomy. More than half of the papers pertain to owls of Australia, which for its size has relatively few species (nine) in only two genera, Tyto and Ninox. However, these species are surprisingly varied in appearance and behavior. Unfortunately, living on a continent with a relatively low human population density does not mean they are safe from threats. In fact, a number of Australia's owls are classified as vulnerable, threatened, or endangered by various state and federal agencies. There are many notable papers in this book. In particular, I was impressed to see that several papers presented results from long-term studies, some of which involved massive volunteer efforts. Three intrinsic factors are influential here: (1) many owls are nonmigratory and show strong site fidelity, so, once found, the birds and sometimes their nests are relatively easy to locate from year to year; (2) many owls use nest boxes, which makes capturing them and monitoring their nest success fairly straightforward; and, (3) owls have an allure, unlike that of many other groups of birds, that attracts and grips volunteers. There is much to learn from this volume, which is packed with salient features and findings. Part 1, for instance, opens with a fine review of population limitation in holarctic owls by Ian Newton, the master of population limitation in birds in general. He points out that the main contribution of the study of holarctic owls to avian ecology has been in demonstrating the influence of food supply on every aspect of demography. Another paper, based on a 20-year study, shows that Barn Owls in southern Scotland occupy sites with the lowest amount of preferred foraging habitat, where their long-term breeding success also is lowest, just as often as sites with opposite characteristics. This is further evidence that it is not safe to assume that source habitats will be occupied at higher densities than sink habitats (Purcell & Verner 1998). For species such as the Barn Owl, which has declined over much of Europe and North America, this finding may have important conservation implications if the pattern is widespread. Knowledge of dispersal is critical for understanding population dynamics and for planning appropriate conservation measures. So a paper on natal dispersal distances in owls in Finland, detailing the use of an incredibly robust data set, is particularly valuable. Researchers and volunteers checked more than 30,000 potential nest sites annually and banded nearly 200,000 owls over a period of about nine decades. Wow! Few studies can top that kind of effort. The author points out that because a safe and efficient method to catch breeding adults of many open-nesting species has not been developed, data on those birds were insufficient for useful analysis. However, such capture methods have been used in North America for decades (e.g., Bloom 1987). One of the most exciting events in recent ornithological history was the rediscovery of the Forest Owlet in central India in 1997, more than a century after the species was last detected. Thus, one of the most exciting papers in this volume reports the results of the first study of the ecology and behavior of this enigmatic gnome. The study provides critical data, but because this owl is rapidly losing habitat, more detailed investigations are urgently needed to determine its degree of endangerment, factors that limit its populations, and what measures to take to safeguard it from extinction. In part 2, a paper on the Powerful Owl in Victoria, Australia, shows this species to be in many respects the ecological equivalent of the Spotted Owl. But because so much of its habitat has been altered in this region, managing this species requires a site-specific approach. The bird is distributed widely in the native box-ironbark forests that remain but at very low densities, apparently in response to low prey densities. Thus, management involves protecting and enhancing individual territories rather than large interconnecting habitat conservation areas. A study of the Barking Owl in Victoria reveals that this species strongly selects forest edges rather than interior habitats. Although human modification is largely responsible for the artificially rich edges, it also has apparently degraded the forest interior, resulting in reduced prey densities in those areas. In part 3, an excellent review of the conservation and management of owls in southeastern Australia points out that an abundance of natural tree cavities in much of the country makes nest box schemes inappropriate. This, the author reasons, has contributed to the lack of studies of the population dynamics and demography of any owl species in Australia. Thus, in contrast to the situation in Finland mentioned above, very few nests have ever been located for most species, and very few birds have ever been banded. This third section also includes the most eloquent and candid review of the Spotted Owl controversy I have ever seen. The author traces the owl's role in bringing about the change in management emphasis on federal lands from timber production to species conservation and forest health. The chapter also highlights the influence of the Spotted Owl on the rise of the modern environmental movement in North America. Part 4 includes a great review of the function and evolution of ear asymmetry. This paper's author offers convincing evidence that ear asymmetry in owls evolved independently at least five times. The obligation of a book reviewer is to point out negative as well as positive points, but I found little to complain about. There are minor typographical errors here and there, as in any book. There are topics I would like to have seen covered—for example, something about owls in Queensland, Australia, where forests and woodlands are being cleared at a brisk pace. But the only real quibble I have is that, because the book was published in Australia and is expensive, it probably will not reach the bulk of the audience it deserves. For instance, the American Ornithologists' Union (AOU) Committee on Classification and Nomenclature overlooked a relevant paper in this volume when it was considering changes for its forty-fourth supplement (2003) to the AOU Check-list of North American Birds (R. Banks, personal communication). And I found the book at only one of the nine University of California campuses. In contrast, the proceedings from the previous international owl conference, which was held in Canada in 1997, were published as a U.S. Forest Service general technical report, which is available free on the Internet. Nevertheless, those who are privileged to read this book will find it useful for understanding various aspects of owl ecology and management, identifying research needs, and defining conservation priorities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueConservation BiologyMême sujetAvian ecology and behaviorTravaux en français237 207