MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Owl Update

2004· article· en· W4234437906 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeff N. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreatened speciesIUCN Red ListGeographyConservation-dependent speciesHabitatEcologyDeforestation (computer science)Conservation statusExtinction (optical mineralogy)Habitat destructionPredationNear-threatened speciesConservation biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecology and Conservation of Owls. Newton, I., R. Kavanagh, J. Olsen, and I. Taylor, editors. 2002. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia. 378 pp. (363 + xv). AU$99.00 or ∼U.S.$68.00 (paperback). ISBN 0–643067949. Owls are a focal point of conservation worldwide. Several, such as the Spotted Owl of North America and the Powerful Owl of Australia, require large amounts of forest with old-growth features, traits that make them vulnerable to logging and deforestation. Because many owls are top predators with large home ranges and demanding habitat requirements and are charismatic and photogenic, conservation planners often have used them as proxies for the forest ecosystems upon which they depend. A large number of the world's owls are at risk to some degree. According to the World Conservation Union's (IUCN) 2003 Red List of Threatened Species, 27 (13%) of the 204 species of owls known to be alive today are in danger of extinction and another 20 (9.8%) are considered near-threatened. Also, because it is difficult to determine species limits in some groups of owls, an unknown number of species yet to be recognized formally also are likely in jeopardy (del Hoyo et al. 1999). Because most owls are nocturnal and otherwise secretive, we know little about them, particularly when it comes to assessing their conservation status or the effects of habitat alterations. Lamentably, some owls may become extinct before we learn even the most rudimentary aspects of their life histories. On the other hand, there has been so much interest in others, such as the Spotted Owl, that they easily rank among the most intensively studied birds in the world. Yet even for these species, some have argued that we are only beginning to accumulate enough demographic data to develop effective conservation strategies (Verner 1992). Thus, it should come as no surprise that the situation for other owls, including the most endangered ones, is far worse. Our understanding of owls of the Southern Hemisphere in particular is woefully incomplete. However, this exceptional book makes significant strides toward rectifying that situation. Ecology and Conservation of Owls is a well-edited and peer-reviewed collection of contributions by some of the world's leading owl researchers. The book is a product of the third international symposium on owls, which was held in Canberra, Australia, in 2000. It offers a tremendous amount of new information, especially on Australian owls, plus several insightful reviews of previous research covering a wide range of topics and species. Like any symposium volume, this one is not an exhaustive survey of current knowledge, but rather a compilation of papers presented at a meeting. Aside from being grouped together in one of the four general sections, which have no introductions, the contributions are independent of one another. It contains 32 papers organized into four parts: (1) population ecology; (2) distribution, habitat, and diet; (3) conservation and management; and (4) voice, structure, and taxonomy. More than half of the papers pertain to owls of Australia, which for its size has relatively few species (nine) in only two genera, Tyto and Ninox. However, these species are surprisingly varied in appearance and behavior. Unfortunately, living on a continent with a relatively low human population density does not mean they are safe from threats. In fact, a number of Australia's owls are classified as vulnerable, threatened, or endangered by various state and federal agencies. There are many notable papers in this book. In particular, I was impressed to see that several papers presented results from long-term studies, some of which involved massive volunteer efforts. Three intrinsic factors are influential here: (1) many owls are nonmigratory and show strong site fidelity, so, once found, the birds and sometimes their nests are relatively easy to locate from year to year; (2) many owls use nest boxes, which makes capturing them and monitoring their nest success fairly straightforward; and, (3) owls have an allure, unlike that of many other groups of birds, that attracts and grips volunteers. There is much to learn from this volume, which is packed with salient features and findings. Part 1, for instance, opens with a fine review of population limitation in holarctic owls by Ian Newton, the master of population limitation in birds in general. He points out that the main contribution of the study of holarctic owls to avian ecology has been in demonstrating the influence of food supply on every aspect of demography. Another paper, based on a 20-year study, shows that Barn Owls in southern Scotland occupy sites with the lowest amount of preferred foraging habitat, where their long-term breeding success also is lowest, just as often as sites with opposite characteristics. This is further evidence that it is not safe to assume that source habitats will be occupied at higher densities than sink habitats (Purcell & Verner 1998). For species such as the Barn Owl, which has declined over much of Europe and North America, this finding may have important conservation implications if the pattern is widespread. Knowledge of dispersal is critical for understanding population dynamics and for planning appropriate conservation measures. So a paper on natal dispersal distances in owls in Finland, detailing the use of an incredibly robust data set, is particularly valuable. Researchers and volunteers checked more than 30,000 potential nest sites annually and banded nearly 200,000 owls over a period of about nine decades. Wow! Few studies can top that kind of effort. The author points out that because a safe and efficient method to catch breeding adults of many open-nesting species has not been developed, data on those birds were insufficient for useful analysis. However, such capture methods have been used in North America for decades (e.g., Bloom 1987). One of the most exciting events in recent ornithological history was the rediscovery of the Forest Owlet in central India in 1997, more than a century after the species was last detected. Thus, one of the most exciting papers in this volume reports the results of the first study of the ecology and behavior of this enigmatic gnome. The study provides critical data, but because this owl is rapidly losing habitat, more detailed investigations are urgently needed to determine its degree of endangerment, factors that limit its populations, and what measures to take to safeguard it from extinction. In part 2, a paper on the Powerful Owl in Victoria, Australia, shows this species to be in many respects the ecological equivalent of the Spotted Owl. But because so much of its habitat has been altered in this region, managing this species requires a site-specific approach. The bird is distributed widely in the native box-ironbark forests that remain but at very low densities, apparently in response to low prey densities. Thus, management involves protecting and enhancing individual territories rather than large interconnecting habitat conservation areas. A study of the Barking Owl in Victoria reveals that this species strongly selects forest edges rather than interior habitats. Although human modification is largely responsible for the artificially rich edges, it also has apparently degraded the forest interior, resulting in reduced prey densities in those areas. In part 3, an excellent review of the conservation and management of owls in southeastern Australia points out that an abundance of natural tree cavities in much of the country makes nest box schemes inappropriate. This, the author reasons, has contributed to the lack of studies of the population dynamics and demography of any owl species in Australia. Thus, in contrast to the situation in Finland mentioned above, very few nests have ever been located for most species, and very few birds have ever been banded. This third section also includes the most eloquent and candid review of the Spotted Owl controversy I have ever seen. The author traces the owl's role in bringing about the change in management emphasis on federal lands from timber production to species conservation and forest health. The chapter also highlights the influence of the Spotted Owl on the rise of the modern environmental movement in North America. Part 4 includes a great review of the function and evolution of ear asymmetry. This paper's author offers convincing evidence that ear asymmetry in owls evolved independently at least five times. The obligation of a book reviewer is to point out negative as well as positive points, but I found little to complain about. There are minor typographical errors here and there, as in any book. There are topics I would like to have seen covered—for example, something about owls in Queensland, Australia, where forests and woodlands are being cleared at a brisk pace. But the only real quibble I have is that, because the book was published in Australia and is expensive, it probably will not reach the bulk of the audience it deserves. For instance, the American Ornithologists' Union (AOU) Committee on Classification and Nomenclature overlooked a relevant paper in this volume when it was considering changes for its forty-fourth supplement (2003) to the AOU Check-list of North American Birds (R. Banks, personal communication). And I found the book at only one of the nine University of California campuses. In contrast, the proceedings from the previous international owl conference, which was held in Canada in 1997, were published as a U.S. Forest Service general technical report, which is available free on the Internet. Nevertheless, those who are privileged to read this book will find it useful for understanding various aspects of owl ecology and management, identifying research needs, and defining conservation priorities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConservation BiologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207