Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Editors' Preface Diane C. Fujino and Lisa Sun-Hee Park We are pleased to announce the transition of the Journal of Asian American Studies to the University of California, Santa Barbara, with Lisa Sun-Hee Park and Diane C. Fujino taking up the helm as co-Editors-in-Chief. This issue begins with a special forum that focuses on issues of utmost importance and complexity and using an innovative format for an academic journal. We would like to think that this anticipates the continuing growth of the journal and expansion into thinking, writing, reading, and exploring in ways that intertwine critical analysis with experimentation and praxis to advance knowledge in our field and society writ large. This will require us to fill big shoes—both those developed in Asian American Studies across more than 50 years and those built by the outgoing editor-in-chief, Rick Bonus. We extend our deep appreciation to Rick for his vision, his ethos of democratic and liberatory practice, his fierce organization, and his caring ways. Our thanks also go to the Association for Asian American Studies Board of Directors; Reviews Editor Lan Dong, Assistant Editor Thaomi Michelle Dinh, the JAAS Editorial Board, and the Johns Hopkins University Press editorial staff. We wish to introduce the journal's new editorial team, which includes Christopher B. Patterson as Reviews Editor and Donna Anderson as Assistant Editor. This issue begins with erin Khuê Ninh and Shireen Roshanravan's co-edited special forum, "#WeToo: A Reader." This daring collection of writings focuses on racialized sexual violence, but not in ways that create any easy divide between perpetrator and survivor. The articles examine the multiple forms of violence and ongoing traumas caused by active aggressors and [End Page vii] enabled through the silencing, denial, and complicity of men and women. The narratives reveal unmistakable acts of violence as well as the ambiguous. They address interlocking systems of race, gender, sexuality, class, and nation, and intergenerational trauma, both structural and interpersonal, that impact the lives of Asian Americans. The authors self-identify as cis, queer, and trans of various Asian and multiracial ancestry. Together, the pieces seek to address, as the co-editors write, "a research question, or maybe a riddle: "What do you get when you cross model-minority racialization and rape culture?" In ways unusual for scholarly journals, this one included, this forum includes primarily poetry, fiction, memoir, and graphic novel, as well as scholarship. Yet, the ways it intersects with scholarly knowledge is clear. It explores the richness, nuances, and contradictions of inner life, "theory in the flesh" that too often disappears in academic writings. It engages honesties and vulnerabilities of a personal nature that require courage and a steady pen. It is intended as a "reader" and we, like so many other readers of JAAS, will recognize the need for such a compilation of writings to assign, bravely, in our classes, to offer language to break the model minority silence around sexual violence in Asian American communities, and to support our students and perhaps ourselves as well. This issue further includes two scholarly articles outside the special forum. Constancio Arnaldo's article, "'We're just as good and even better than you': Asian American Female Flag Footballers and the Racial Politics of Competition," examines the workings of racialized gender and the Asian American feminine body in sports. Based in ethnographic research, Arnaldo shows flag football as a site where Asian American women athletes perform identities that are both constrained by and contest constructions of Asian American women as hyperfeminine and hypersexual. Their agility and athleticism are seen in spectacular spin moves, touchdowns, and defensive maneuvers, and yet, they face the ongoing invisibility so familiar to Asian Americans in sports. Arnaldo reveals the Asian American women athlete's off-the-court maneuvers to assert identities and performances on their own terms. Balbir Singh's article, "'Anchorless Unknown': Reading and Feeling the Komagata Maru Beyond Repair," expands the notion of the archive to read feelings into a historical incident through textual analyses of two state apologies and a poem. In 1914, the Canadian government refused the disembarkment of 376 mainly Sikh, but Muslim and Hindu migrants as well...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».