MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234480011 · doi:10.1353/jaas.2021.0000

Editors' Preface

2021· article· en· W4234480011 on OpenAlex
Diane C. Fujino, Lisa Sun-Hee Park

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asian American Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEditorial boardLibrary scienceEditor in chiefReading (process)SociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceManagementLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editors' Preface Diane C. Fujino and Lisa Sun-Hee Park We are pleased to announce the transition of the Journal of Asian American Studies to the University of California, Santa Barbara, with Lisa Sun-Hee Park and Diane C. Fujino taking up the helm as co-Editors-in-Chief. This issue begins with a special forum that focuses on issues of utmost importance and complexity and using an innovative format for an academic journal. We would like to think that this anticipates the continuing growth of the journal and expansion into thinking, writing, reading, and exploring in ways that intertwine critical analysis with experimentation and praxis to advance knowledge in our field and society writ large. This will require us to fill big shoes—both those developed in Asian American Studies across more than 50 years and those built by the outgoing editor-in-chief, Rick Bonus. We extend our deep appreciation to Rick for his vision, his ethos of democratic and liberatory practice, his fierce organization, and his caring ways. Our thanks also go to the Association for Asian American Studies Board of Directors; Reviews Editor Lan Dong, Assistant Editor Thaomi Michelle Dinh, the JAAS Editorial Board, and the Johns Hopkins University Press editorial staff. We wish to introduce the journal's new editorial team, which includes Christopher B. Patterson as Reviews Editor and Donna Anderson as Assistant Editor. This issue begins with erin Khuê Ninh and Shireen Roshanravan's co-edited special forum, "#WeToo: A Reader." This daring collection of writings focuses on racialized sexual violence, but not in ways that create any easy divide between perpetrator and survivor. The articles examine the multiple forms of violence and ongoing traumas caused by active aggressors and [End Page vii] enabled through the silencing, denial, and complicity of men and women. The narratives reveal unmistakable acts of violence as well as the ambiguous. They address interlocking systems of race, gender, sexuality, class, and nation, and intergenerational trauma, both structural and interpersonal, that impact the lives of Asian Americans. The authors self-identify as cis, queer, and trans of various Asian and multiracial ancestry. Together, the pieces seek to address, as the co-editors write, "a research question, or maybe a riddle: "What do you get when you cross model-minority racialization and rape culture?" In ways unusual for scholarly journals, this one included, this forum includes primarily poetry, fiction, memoir, and graphic novel, as well as scholarship. Yet, the ways it intersects with scholarly knowledge is clear. It explores the richness, nuances, and contradictions of inner life, "theory in the flesh" that too often disappears in academic writings. It engages honesties and vulnerabilities of a personal nature that require courage and a steady pen. It is intended as a "reader" and we, like so many other readers of JAAS, will recognize the need for such a compilation of writings to assign, bravely, in our classes, to offer language to break the model minority silence around sexual violence in Asian American communities, and to support our students and perhaps ourselves as well. This issue further includes two scholarly articles outside the special forum. Constancio Arnaldo's article, "'We're just as good and even better than you': Asian American Female Flag Footballers and the Racial Politics of Competition," examines the workings of racialized gender and the Asian American feminine body in sports. Based in ethnographic research, Arnaldo shows flag football as a site where Asian American women athletes perform identities that are both constrained by and contest constructions of Asian American women as hyperfeminine and hypersexual. Their agility and athleticism are seen in spectacular spin moves, touchdowns, and defensive maneuvers, and yet, they face the ongoing invisibility so familiar to Asian Americans in sports. Arnaldo reveals the Asian American women athlete's off-the-court maneuvers to assert identities and performances on their own terms. Balbir Singh's article, "'Anchorless Unknown': Reading and Feeling the Komagata Maru Beyond Repair," expands the notion of the archive to read feelings into a historical incident through textual analyses of two state apologies and a poem. In 1914, the Canadian government refused the disembarkment of 376 mainly Sikh, but Muslim and Hindu migrants as well...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it