MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234480011 · doi:10.1353/jaas.2021.0000

Editors' Preface

2021· article· en· W4234480011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane C. Fujino, Lisa Sun-Hee Park

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asian American Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEditorial boardLibrary scienceEditor in chiefReading (process)SociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceManagementLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editors' Preface Diane C. Fujino and Lisa Sun-Hee Park We are pleased to announce the transition of the Journal of Asian American Studies to the University of California, Santa Barbara, with Lisa Sun-Hee Park and Diane C. Fujino taking up the helm as co-Editors-in-Chief. This issue begins with a special forum that focuses on issues of utmost importance and complexity and using an innovative format for an academic journal. We would like to think that this anticipates the continuing growth of the journal and expansion into thinking, writing, reading, and exploring in ways that intertwine critical analysis with experimentation and praxis to advance knowledge in our field and society writ large. This will require us to fill big shoes—both those developed in Asian American Studies across more than 50 years and those built by the outgoing editor-in-chief, Rick Bonus. We extend our deep appreciation to Rick for his vision, his ethos of democratic and liberatory practice, his fierce organization, and his caring ways. Our thanks also go to the Association for Asian American Studies Board of Directors; Reviews Editor Lan Dong, Assistant Editor Thaomi Michelle Dinh, the JAAS Editorial Board, and the Johns Hopkins University Press editorial staff. We wish to introduce the journal's new editorial team, which includes Christopher B. Patterson as Reviews Editor and Donna Anderson as Assistant Editor. This issue begins with erin Khuê Ninh and Shireen Roshanravan's co-edited special forum, "#WeToo: A Reader." This daring collection of writings focuses on racialized sexual violence, but not in ways that create any easy divide between perpetrator and survivor. The articles examine the multiple forms of violence and ongoing traumas caused by active aggressors and [End Page vii] enabled through the silencing, denial, and complicity of men and women. The narratives reveal unmistakable acts of violence as well as the ambiguous. They address interlocking systems of race, gender, sexuality, class, and nation, and intergenerational trauma, both structural and interpersonal, that impact the lives of Asian Americans. The authors self-identify as cis, queer, and trans of various Asian and multiracial ancestry. Together, the pieces seek to address, as the co-editors write, "a research question, or maybe a riddle: "What do you get when you cross model-minority racialization and rape culture?" In ways unusual for scholarly journals, this one included, this forum includes primarily poetry, fiction, memoir, and graphic novel, as well as scholarship. Yet, the ways it intersects with scholarly knowledge is clear. It explores the richness, nuances, and contradictions of inner life, "theory in the flesh" that too often disappears in academic writings. It engages honesties and vulnerabilities of a personal nature that require courage and a steady pen. It is intended as a "reader" and we, like so many other readers of JAAS, will recognize the need for such a compilation of writings to assign, bravely, in our classes, to offer language to break the model minority silence around sexual violence in Asian American communities, and to support our students and perhaps ourselves as well. This issue further includes two scholarly articles outside the special forum. Constancio Arnaldo's article, "'We're just as good and even better than you': Asian American Female Flag Footballers and the Racial Politics of Competition," examines the workings of racialized gender and the Asian American feminine body in sports. Based in ethnographic research, Arnaldo shows flag football as a site where Asian American women athletes perform identities that are both constrained by and contest constructions of Asian American women as hyperfeminine and hypersexual. Their agility and athleticism are seen in spectacular spin moves, touchdowns, and defensive maneuvers, and yet, they face the ongoing invisibility so familiar to Asian Americans in sports. Arnaldo reveals the Asian American women athlete's off-the-court maneuvers to assert identities and performances on their own terms. Balbir Singh's article, "'Anchorless Unknown': Reading and Feeling the Komagata Maru Beyond Repair," expands the notion of the archive to read feelings into a historical incident through textual analyses of two state apologies and a poem. In 1914, the Canadian government refused the disembarkment of 376 mainly Sikh, but Muslim and Hindu migrants as well...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2200.196

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Asian American StudiesSame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207