Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Citation (2014), "List of Contributors", Environmental Contexts and Disability (Research in Social Science and Disability, Vol. 8), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-354720140000008016 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Barbara M. Altman Sociology Department, University of Maryland, MD, USA Nancy Arnold Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana’s Rural Institute on Disabilities, Missoula, MT, USA Rebecca Beals Sociology Department, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA Mary Beth Bezzina School of Occupational Therapy, Western University London, ON, Canada Normand Boucher Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Don Carruthers Den Hoed Provincial Inclusion Team Leader with Alberta Parks in Western Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Lubna Daraz Division of Equity, Diversity and Human Rights in the City of Toronto, Canada Heather Dillaway Department of Sociology at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI, USA Geoffrey Edwards Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Robert Fiala Sociology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA Patrick Fougeyrollas Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Gillian Gorfine School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada Yan Grenier Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Julia Hammond Psychology Department, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA Catherine Ipsen Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana’s Rural Institute on Disabilities, Missoula, MT, USA Sonya L. Jakubec School of Nursing at Mount Royal University in Calgary, AB, Canada Lisa Klinger School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada Debbie Laliberte Rudman School of Occupational Therapy in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Western University, London, ON, Canada Donald J. Lollar Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA Catherine Lysack Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, and Institute of Gerontology at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI, USA Bradford J. McFadyen Department of Rehabilitation at Laval University in Quebec City, Canada Stephen Meyers Department of Sociology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA Chelsea Mohler National Educational Association of Disabled Students (NEADS), Toronto, ON, Canada Ernesto Morales School of Rehabilitation at Laval University, and a Member of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec, Canada Luc Noreau Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec, Canada Amy Patel Health and Rehabilitation Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada Elizabeth K. Rasch Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section National Institutes of Health, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Bethesda, MD, USA Heather Ray Department of Physical Education and Recreation at Mount Royal University in Calgary, AB, Canada Brandon Rennie Psychology Department, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA Kenneth L. Robey Matheny Institute for Research in Developmental Disabilities, Matheny Medical and Educational Center, Peapack, NJ, USA Tom Seekins Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana’s Rural Institute on Disabilities, Missoula, MT, USA Lynn Shaw Pacific Coast University, British Columbia, Canada Claude Vincent Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec, Canada Book Chapters Environmental Contexts and Disability Research in Social Science and Disability Environmental Contexts and Disability Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction: Environmental Contexts and Disability Disabled Persons Associations at the Crossroads of Two Organizational Environments: Grassroots Groups as Part of an International Movement and Local Civil Society The Experience of Environmental Barriers among Adults with Disabilities: A National Description Assessing and Comparing the Accessibility of Community Environments: A Feasibility Study Disability, Rehabilitation Research and Post-Cartesian Embodied Ontologies – Has the Research Paradigm Changed? Schelling’s Checkerboard and Computer Simulators’ Predictions of Spatial Isolation of Group Homes for Persons with Disabilities Exploring the Feasibility of Using “Google Street View” to Assess the Accessibility of Community Environments: Developing Definitions and Observational Protocol for Image Recognition and Classification The Effects of Professional Discourse on Disability 1931–2009: Environments of Inclusive and Restricted Participation Using a Rapid Scan to Assess the Need for a Scoping Review of the Literature on the Environment and Disability Examining Macro and Meso Level Barriers to Hiring Persons with Disabilities: A Scoping Review ‘I Can Reinvent Myself Out Here’: Experiences of Nature Inclusion and Mental Well-Being Encounters with Inaccessibility: The Contexts Women with Spinal Cord Injury Face when Seeking Gynecological Health Care An Examination of Systems-Level Barriers to Employment for Persons with Vision Loss About the Authors and Editors
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,033 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,734 | 0,722 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».