MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

List of Contributors

2014· other· en· W4234481418 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingRehabilitationLibrary scienceSociologyEmeraldGerontologyPolitical scienceManagementMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2014), "List of Contributors", Environmental Contexts and Disability (Research in Social Science and Disability, Vol. 8), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-354720140000008016 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Barbara M. Altman Sociology Department, University of Maryland, MD, USA Nancy Arnold Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana’s Rural Institute on Disabilities, Missoula, MT, USA Rebecca Beals Sociology Department, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA Mary Beth Bezzina School of Occupational Therapy, Western University London, ON, Canada Normand Boucher Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Don Carruthers Den Hoed Provincial Inclusion Team Leader with Alberta Parks in Western Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Lubna Daraz Division of Equity, Diversity and Human Rights in the City of Toronto, Canada Heather Dillaway Department of Sociology at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI, USA Geoffrey Edwards Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Robert Fiala Sociology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA Patrick Fougeyrollas Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Gillian Gorfine School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada Yan Grenier Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec Institute for Physical Rehabilitation, Quebec, Canada Julia Hammond Psychology Department, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA Catherine Ipsen Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana’s Rural Institute on Disabilities, Missoula, MT, USA Sonya L. Jakubec School of Nursing at Mount Royal University in Calgary, AB, Canada Lisa Klinger School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada Debbie Laliberte Rudman School of Occupational Therapy in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Western University, London, ON, Canada Donald J. Lollar Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA Catherine Lysack Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, and Institute of Gerontology at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI, USA Bradford J. McFadyen Department of Rehabilitation at Laval University in Quebec City, Canada Stephen Meyers Department of Sociology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA Chelsea Mohler National Educational Association of Disabled Students (NEADS), Toronto, ON, Canada Ernesto Morales School of Rehabilitation at Laval University, and a Member of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec, Canada Luc Noreau Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec, Canada Amy Patel Health and Rehabilitation Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada Elizabeth K. Rasch Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section National Institutes of Health, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Bethesda, MD, USA Heather Ray Department of Physical Education and Recreation at Mount Royal University in Calgary, AB, Canada Brandon Rennie Psychology Department, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA Kenneth L. Robey Matheny Institute for Research in Developmental Disabilities, Matheny Medical and Educational Center, Peapack, NJ, USA Tom Seekins Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana’s Rural Institute on Disabilities, Missoula, MT, USA Lynn Shaw Pacific Coast University, British Columbia, Canada Claude Vincent Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec, Canada Book Chapters Environmental Contexts and Disability Research in Social Science and Disability Environmental Contexts and Disability Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction: Environmental Contexts and Disability Disabled Persons Associations at the Crossroads of Two Organizational Environments: Grassroots Groups as Part of an International Movement and Local Civil Society The Experience of Environmental Barriers among Adults with Disabilities: A National Description Assessing and Comparing the Accessibility of Community Environments: A Feasibility Study Disability, Rehabilitation Research and Post-Cartesian Embodied Ontologies – Has the Research Paradigm Changed? Schelling’s Checkerboard and Computer Simulators’ Predictions of Spatial Isolation of Group Homes for Persons with Disabilities Exploring the Feasibility of Using “Google Street View” to Assess the Accessibility of Community Environments: Developing Definitions and Observational Protocol for Image Recognition and Classification The Effects of Professional Discourse on Disability 1931–2009: Environments of Inclusive and Restricted Participation Using a Rapid Scan to Assess the Need for a Scoping Review of the Literature on the Environment and Disability Examining Macro and Meso Level Barriers to Hiring Persons with Disabilities: A Scoping Review ‘I Can Reinvent Myself Out Here’: Experiences of Nature Inclusion and Mental Well-Being Encounters with Inaccessibility: The Contexts Women with Spinal Cord Injury Face when Seeking Gynecological Health Care An Examination of Systems-Level Barriers to Employment for Persons with Vision Loss About the Authors and Editors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7340.722

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207