Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Providing supervised access to pharmaceutical heroin to people whose use continues after trying multiple traditional treatments has been successful in other countries and should be piloted and studied in the United States, according to a RAND Corporation study released Dec. 6. “Given the increasing number of deaths associated with fentanyl and successful use of heroin‐assisted treatment abroad, the U.S. should pilot and study this approach in some cities,” said Beau Kilmer, leader of the project and co‐director of the RAND Drug Policy Research Center. “This is not a silver bullet or first‐line treatment. But there is evidence that it helps stabilize the lives of some people who use heroin.” The RAND findings appear in five related RAND publications and are based on experiences in other countries, including Canada, where Vancouver has that country's only heroin prescription. To assess the effectiveness of heroin‐assisted treatment and supervised consumption sites, RAND researchers reviewed scientific evidence and talked to more than two dozen stakeholders in Canada, the Netherlands, Switzerland and the United Kingdom to learn about their experiences with the approaches. They also spoke to more than 150 people in New Hampshire and Ohio, two states hard hit by opioid overdoses. The researchers found the documentation supporting supervised injection sites to be less solid than that supporting medical‐grade heroin provision. “Persistence does not imply effectiveness, but it seems unlikely that supervised consumption sites — which were initially controversial in many places — would have such longevity if they had serious adverse consequences for their clients or communities,” Kilmer said. For example, supervised consumption sites currently supervise a very small proportion of all injection sessions even in cities where they are well‐established. “It may even be worth asking whether the benefits of supervised consumption sites depend on there being a physical brick‐and‐mortar site, which may become a lightning rod for opposition, or if the key is just that consumption is supervised and whether there are other ways to get more opioid consumption supervised,” said Jonathan P. Caulkins, a report co‐author and a professor of public policy at Carnegie Mellon University. Caulkins said it also is possible that supervised injection of hydromorphone — a prescription opioid medication — may achieve similar benefits as offering supervised injectable heroin for those with heroin use disorder, but with fewer regulatory barriers in the United States, where heroin is illegal. The report, Considering Heroin‐Assisted Treatment and Supervised Drug Consumption Sites in the United States , is available at www.rand.org . Funding for the study was provided by RAND Ventures, which is supported by gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».