MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4234969474 · doi:10.24124/2016/bpgub1118

Cognitive dissonance in social work - the experiences of social workers who facilitate transracial adoption plans for aboriginal children

2016· dissertation· en· W4234969474 sur OpenAlexaff
Susan Burke

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChild Welfare and Adoption
Établissements canadiensTrinity Western UniversityUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesMinistry of Economy, Trade and Industry
Mots-clésLegal guardianKinship careFoster careGuardianPsychologyGrandparentKinshipSocial workNursingMedicinePolitical scienceLawDevelopmental psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Aboriginal Transracial Adoption and Cultural Planning parents have committed to providing long-term care to situations where community members have maintained contact with a child as he/she has moved through different placements.For the purpose of this research study, the term "permanency planning" will refer to legal plans that are made with the intention of guardianship, care, and custody being officially transferred to a caregiver until the child reaches adulthood.Unofficially, these plans have the intention of providing a lifelong sense of family and belonging to a child.Under the CFCSA and the Adoption Act, there are several ways to provide permanency to children.CFCSA Section 54.01: Permanent kinship care.In 2013, the CFCSA was amended to include Section 54.01 , allowing social workers to facilitate the legal transfer of permanent care and custody from birth parents to a friend or family member without that child coming into care.This plan is made with birth parent consent.MCFD is able to provide maintenance, but no other support services, until the child turns 19, and the guardian is responsible for providing medical, dental, and optical care.MCFD must approve these placements by completing a homestudy, including criminal record checks, doctor's reports, and references.CFCSA Section 49: Continuing custody.Under Section 49 of the CFCSA, a social worker can also apply for a Continuing Custody Order (CCO), either with or without birth parent consent.This order permanently transfers care and custody of a child from his/her birth parent to MCFD, essentially making the provincial government the child ' s legal parent.A child in care under this section is often referred to as a "permanent ward", a "CCO", or a "continuing care ward".After the order is granted, the child ' s file is generally transferred to a social worker who specializes in guardianship and/or permanency planning for children.Although many continuing care wards stay in foster care until they turn 19, legislation, practice standards, and societal views dictate that plans be found for these children that provide them with continuity and stability.The social workers left with this task are generally referred to as " guardianship social workers", "adoption social workers" and/or "permanency planning social workers".14 CF CSA Section 54.1: Transfer of custody.Under Section 54.1 , social workers are able to permanently transfer the care and custody of a child who is a continuing care ward from MCFD to another person.MCFD must approve these placements by completing a homestudy, including criminal record checks, doctor's reports, and references.MCFD is able to provide maintenance, but no other support services, until the child turns 19, and the guardian is responsible for providing medical, dental, and optical care.Adoption Act.The adoption of children in BC is legislated through the Adoption Act (MCFD, 1996a).MCFD social workers are generally involved in two types of adoption placements under this Act.In the first, a social worker places a continuing care ward for adoption, with MCFD consenting to the adoption as the child ' s legal parent.In the second, a social worker facilitates the permanent transfer of care and custody from a birth parent to an adoptive family.MCFD must approve these placements by completing a home study, including criminal record checks, doctor's reports, and references.All families who adopt children through MCFD are eligible to apply for both monthly maintenance and support services; however, approval is not guaranteed, adding to the pressure experienced by permanency planning social workers who are then tasked with supporting families raising high needs children with no assurance that financial supports will be provided.Although the route that a child takes from first entering the child welfare system to being placed under one of these permanency options can be complicated, some routes are more common than others.Decisions are made by social workers, their team leaders, and their managers as to whether or not a child should come into care, how long that child should stay in

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,952
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,096

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,019
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0020,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetChild Welfare and AdoptionTravaux en français237 207