MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234969474 · doi:10.24124/2016/bpgub1118

Cognitive dissonance in social work - the experiences of social workers who facilitate transracial adoption plans for aboriginal children

2016· dissertation· en· W4234969474 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Burke

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersMinistry of Economy, Trade and Industry
KeywordsLegal guardianKinship careFoster careGuardianPsychologyGrandparentKinshipSocial workNursingMedicinePolitical scienceLawDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aboriginal Transracial Adoption and Cultural Planning parents have committed to providing long-term care to situations where community members have maintained contact with a child as he/she has moved through different placements.For the purpose of this research study, the term "permanency planning" will refer to legal plans that are made with the intention of guardianship, care, and custody being officially transferred to a caregiver until the child reaches adulthood.Unofficially, these plans have the intention of providing a lifelong sense of family and belonging to a child.Under the CFCSA and the Adoption Act, there are several ways to provide permanency to children.CFCSA Section 54.01: Permanent kinship care.In 2013, the CFCSA was amended to include Section 54.01 , allowing social workers to facilitate the legal transfer of permanent care and custody from birth parents to a friend or family member without that child coming into care.This plan is made with birth parent consent.MCFD is able to provide maintenance, but no other support services, until the child turns 19, and the guardian is responsible for providing medical, dental, and optical care.MCFD must approve these placements by completing a homestudy, including criminal record checks, doctor's reports, and references.CFCSA Section 49: Continuing custody.Under Section 49 of the CFCSA, a social worker can also apply for a Continuing Custody Order (CCO), either with or without birth parent consent.This order permanently transfers care and custody of a child from his/her birth parent to MCFD, essentially making the provincial government the child ' s legal parent.A child in care under this section is often referred to as a "permanent ward", a "CCO", or a "continuing care ward".After the order is granted, the child ' s file is generally transferred to a social worker who specializes in guardianship and/or permanency planning for children.Although many continuing care wards stay in foster care until they turn 19, legislation, practice standards, and societal views dictate that plans be found for these children that provide them with continuity and stability.The social workers left with this task are generally referred to as " guardianship social workers", "adoption social workers" and/or "permanency planning social workers".14 CF CSA Section 54.1: Transfer of custody.Under Section 54.1 , social workers are able to permanently transfer the care and custody of a child who is a continuing care ward from MCFD to another person.MCFD must approve these placements by completing a homestudy, including criminal record checks, doctor's reports, and references.MCFD is able to provide maintenance, but no other support services, until the child turns 19, and the guardian is responsible for providing medical, dental, and optical care.Adoption Act.The adoption of children in BC is legislated through the Adoption Act (MCFD, 1996a).MCFD social workers are generally involved in two types of adoption placements under this Act.In the first, a social worker places a continuing care ward for adoption, with MCFD consenting to the adoption as the child ' s legal parent.In the second, a social worker facilitates the permanent transfer of care and custody from a birth parent to an adoptive family.MCFD must approve these placements by completing a home study, including criminal record checks, doctor's reports, and references.All families who adopt children through MCFD are eligible to apply for both monthly maintenance and support services; however, approval is not guaranteed, adding to the pressure experienced by permanency planning social workers who are then tasked with supporting families raising high needs children with no assurance that financial supports will be provided.Although the route that a child takes from first entering the child welfare system to being placed under one of these permanency options can be complicated, some routes are more common than others.Decisions are made by social workers, their team leaders, and their managers as to whether or not a child should come into care, how long that child should stay in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.019
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207