Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We are delighted to welcome you to the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, in Cape Town, South Africa. This is a very special occasion, as it is the first time that ICSE has been held in Africa. This promises to be a particularly exciting event, with an opening address by the Nobel Laureate, the Most Reverend Bishop Desmond Tutu, keynotes by Sir David King, Professor Fred Schneider and Clem Sunter, and an outstanding technical program. In keeping with ICSE's first time in Africa, the theme of the conference is New Horizons. New challenges face our community: from new hardware platforms, increased software complexity and more demanding safety and dependability requirements to major global issues such as the environment and the economic downturn. Our community can play a critical role in meeting these challenges, and the conference provides an ideal forum to discuss and report on new challenges and promising results in software engineering. The long and distinguished tradition of ICSE continues this year with a broad spectrum of events showcasing the best current work in research, practice and education. The heart of the meeting is the research paper track. This year, this track received 380 submissions. These submissions underwent a rigorous two-phase review processes, including for the first time an opportunity for authors to respond to the reviewers for consideration at the final program committee meeting. After a two-day meeting at Imperial College in London, a 40-member program committee selected 54 papers (14%) for inclusion in the program. Papers present research from many different countries, including: Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. The conference also includes the following tracks: Software Engineering in Practice, Software Engineering in Education, New Ideas and Emerging Results, and Research Demonstrations. In each case, the numbers of accepted papers and submissions were respectively 16 from 71 (22.5%), 7 from 33 (21%), 19 from 76 (25%) and 15 from 60 (25%). Together with the research track, this represents a total of 620 paper submissions, a wonderful indication of the continuing strength of ICSE! In addition, we have a large number of workshops and tutorials both before and after the conference, and a Doctoral Symposium and Emerging Faculty Symposium.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle