MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234990475 · doi:10.1145/1806799

Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1

2010· paratext· en· W4234990475 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent (particle physics)Theme (computing)Library scienceComputer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are delighted to welcome you to the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, in Cape Town, South Africa. This is a very special occasion, as it is the first time that ICSE has been held in Africa. This promises to be a particularly exciting event, with an opening address by the Nobel Laureate, the Most Reverend Bishop Desmond Tutu, keynotes by Sir David King, Professor Fred Schneider and Clem Sunter, and an outstanding technical program. In keeping with ICSE's first time in Africa, the theme of the conference is New Horizons. New challenges face our community: from new hardware platforms, increased software complexity and more demanding safety and dependability requirements to major global issues such as the environment and the economic downturn. Our community can play a critical role in meeting these challenges, and the conference provides an ideal forum to discuss and report on new challenges and promising results in software engineering. The long and distinguished tradition of ICSE continues this year with a broad spectrum of events showcasing the best current work in research, practice and education. The heart of the meeting is the research paper track. This year, this track received 380 submissions. These submissions underwent a rigorous two-phase review processes, including for the first time an opportunity for authors to respond to the reviewers for consideration at the final program committee meeting. After a two-day meeting at Imperial College in London, a 40-member program committee selected 54 papers (14%) for inclusion in the program. Papers present research from many different countries, including: Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. The conference also includes the following tracks: Software Engineering in Practice, Software Engineering in Education, New Ideas and Emerging Results, and Research Demonstrations. In each case, the numbers of accepted papers and submissions were respectively 16 from 71 (22.5%), 7 from 33 (21%), 19 from 76 (25%) and 15 from 60 (25%). Together with the research track, this represents a total of 620 paper submissions, a wonderful indication of the continuing strength of ICSE! In addition, we have a large number of workshops and tutorials both before and after the conference, and a Doctoral Symposium and Emerging Faculty Symposium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it