MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4235802892 · doi:10.2523/83990-ms

The Influence of Leadership and Behaviours on Safety Performance

2003· article· en· W4235802892 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of Offshore Europe · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueOccupational Health and Safety Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCompetence (human resources)EngineeringSubmarine pipelineOperations managementTransport engineeringBusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Management

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper describes KCA DEUTAG's innovative approach to applying behavioural safety theory as a practical tool to discover why the Company experiences inconsistent safety performance across its North Sea operations despite the commonality of equipment and procedures. It draws conclusions which result from safety culture surveys, the application of the Step Change, Safety Culture Maturity Model and most recently an analysis by a highly regarded industry expert of the KCA DEUTAG/client interface on several of its' platforms. The paper makes recommendations, which are designed to assist others in the practical application of behavioural safety theory such that consistent improvements in safety performance are achievable.Introduction. KCA DEUTAG is an international land and offshore well engineering contractor employing around 3,500 people worldwide. In the North Sea, where KCA DEUTAG employs some 1,300 offshore workers, activities are solely platform based. The Company provides drill crews and manages drilling operations for Amerada Hess, Apache, BP, Britannia Operator Limited, Canadian Natural Resources, ChevronTexaco, DNO, ExxonMobil, Shell Expro and Total. Although of various ages and states of mechanisation, the main components of the drilling package on each installation are similar. KCA DEUTAG has a well established Health Safety and Environmental Management System, whose policies, standards and processes, many of which are regarded as industry leading by the Health and Safety Executive, are consistent across all of the Company's operations. The Company's recruitment, training and competence processes are also uniform across all of its clients' installations. Employees are transferred between installations through promotion and at times of downmanning.In effect, KCA DEUTAG's North Sea operations are conducted in a similar environment using similar equipment operated by similar people using a standard set of procedures. However, the Company experiences significantly different safety performance on different installations. The variations in safety performance have been within client asset groups as well as across different clients. For example, in 1996, the crews on one client's platforms worked some 830,000 man hours without suffering a Lost Time Incident. In 1997, the same crews on the same clients platforms worked some 930,000 man hours and suffered 11 Lost Time Accidents (as defined by UK RIDDOR regulations which are far more onerous than IADC definitions). KCA DEUTAG crews on certain platforms have performed consistently well whereas crews on other client's platforms have not achieved such high standards of safety performance.In setting out down the path of a behavioural safety programme, KCA DEUTAG fully realised that this work would not bear fruit overnight. The Company's senior management gave their full support and commitment to a long-term programme of safety performance improvement through detailed research and analysis into the various influences on safety performance across its operations. This would be no short-term reactive fix but a drive to get to the root of behavioural safety issues and take steps to identify and implement best practice throughout. Indeed, the belief in behavioural safety as the remaining area of focus in the triumvirate of equipment and hardware, procedures and documentation and safety culture, required firm resolve when faced with accidents and incidents which traditionally demanded some form of knee jerk reaction to satisfy client and KCA DEUTAG managers' expectations alike. The fact that the work commenced in 1998 and continues in 2003 is evidence of this long-term commitment.Behavioural Safety Programme 1998–2003. Clearly KCA DEUTAG's behavioural safety programme did not just suddenly start in 1998. Many of the concepts had been used in the past, for example, the KCA DEUTAG Toolbox Talk and Risk Identification Card (TRIC) was developed in 1997 with significant input from the workforce and has proved to be one of the Company's most effective risk management tools, encouraging leadership, communication and workforce involvement.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,469

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,090
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle