List of Contributors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Citation (2013), "List of Contributors", Getting Things Done (Dialogues in Critical Management Studies, Vol. 2), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2046-6072(2013)0000002003 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Sarah Amato Victoria College, University of Toronto, Canada Ana Celano Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-EBAPE), Brazil Wendy Cukier Ryerson University, Canada Alex Faria EBAPE, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Brazil Yuna Reis Essex Sustainability Institute, Essex Business School, UK Suzanne Gagnon Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Canada Charity Hannan Ryerson University, Canada Jean Helms Mills Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Canada; Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland David Jacobs Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA Nimruji Jammulamadaka Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, India Katariina Juusola Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Pertti Kettunen Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Laura Mae Lindo Faculty of Education, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Virpi Malin Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Richard Marens California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA Albert J. Mills Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Canada Jonathan Murphy Cardiff Business School, UK Martin Parker University of Leicester, UK Marjo Siltaoja Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Ville-Pekka Sorsa Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland Sarah Stookey Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT, USA Sergio Wanderley Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-EBAPE), Brazil David Weir School of Business, Leadership and Enterprise, University Campus Suffolk, UK; and ESC Rennes, France David Wicks Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Canada Hugh Willmott Cardiff Business School, UK Book Chapters Getting Things Done Dialogues in Critical Management Studies Getting Things Done Copyright Page Dedication List of Contributors Beyond Critique: Towards Transformative Practice in Critical Management Studies. Editors’ Introduction What Exactly did you Expect from CMS? American Business Schools as an Expression of Futile Relations Critical Management: The Longer Haul Described in Almost Polemic Mode CMS – A Solution or an Extra Problem for Management Research? Resisting the Sense of Futility Getting (The Wrong/Right) Things Done – Problems and Possibilities in U.S. Business Schools Academic Capitalism Hits the Fan: The Birth of Acamanic Capitalism Changing Institutions: Critical Management Studies as a Social Movement ☆ Earlier versions of this chapter were presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Hawaii, 2005 and at the European Group for Organization Studies Annual Conference, Bergen, 2006 and seminars at Imperial College London and the University of Warwick during 2007. The work involved as a panel member in the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise resulted in the draft being set aside. The invitation to contribute to this volume prompted me to return to it and update it. I would like to thank everyone who has participated in discussing, and providing comments on, the paper and to the editors of this collection for inviting me to contribute to it. ‘What is to be Done?’ CMS as a Political Party Being Political and Getting Things Done: Critical Management Studies and the Limits of Antagonism What do Business Schools Really Teach? The Role of Critical Management Studies in Business Education Can the Subaltern Teach? Performativity Otherwise Through Anthropophagy ☆ The title is inspired by Spivak “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1985). What to Stop Doing in Order to Get Things Done? A Critical Engagement with the Discourse of Critical Management Studies A [Critical] Ecological Model to Enabling Change: Promoting Diversity and Inclusion Border Thinking in Action: Should Critical Management Studies Get Anything Done? Reflections on the Theory–Action Debate About the Authors Author Index
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,716 | 0,726 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».