Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2013), "List of Contributors", Getting Things Done (Dialogues in Critical Management Studies, Vol. 2), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2046-6072(2013)0000002003 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Sarah Amato Victoria College, University of Toronto, Canada Ana Celano Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-EBAPE), Brazil Wendy Cukier Ryerson University, Canada Alex Faria EBAPE, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Brazil Yuna Reis Essex Sustainability Institute, Essex Business School, UK Suzanne Gagnon Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Canada Charity Hannan Ryerson University, Canada Jean Helms Mills Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Canada; Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland David Jacobs Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA Nimruji Jammulamadaka Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, India Katariina Juusola Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Pertti Kettunen Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Laura Mae Lindo Faculty of Education, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Virpi Malin Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Richard Marens California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA Albert J. Mills Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Canada Jonathan Murphy Cardiff Business School, UK Martin Parker University of Leicester, UK Marjo Siltaoja Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Finland Ville-Pekka Sorsa Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland Sarah Stookey Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT, USA Sergio Wanderley Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-EBAPE), Brazil David Weir School of Business, Leadership and Enterprise, University Campus Suffolk, UK; and ESC Rennes, France David Wicks Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Canada Hugh Willmott Cardiff Business School, UK Book Chapters Getting Things Done Dialogues in Critical Management Studies Getting Things Done Copyright Page Dedication List of Contributors Beyond Critique: Towards Transformative Practice in Critical Management Studies. Editors’ Introduction What Exactly did you Expect from CMS? American Business Schools as an Expression of Futile Relations Critical Management: The Longer Haul Described in Almost Polemic Mode CMS – A Solution or an Extra Problem for Management Research? Resisting the Sense of Futility Getting (The Wrong/Right) Things Done – Problems and Possibilities in U.S. Business Schools Academic Capitalism Hits the Fan: The Birth of Acamanic Capitalism Changing Institutions: Critical Management Studies as a Social Movement ☆ Earlier versions of this chapter were presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Hawaii, 2005 and at the European Group for Organization Studies Annual Conference, Bergen, 2006 and seminars at Imperial College London and the University of Warwick during 2007. The work involved as a panel member in the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise resulted in the draft being set aside. The invitation to contribute to this volume prompted me to return to it and update it. I would like to thank everyone who has participated in discussing, and providing comments on, the paper and to the editors of this collection for inviting me to contribute to it. ‘What is to be Done?’ CMS as a Political Party Being Political and Getting Things Done: Critical Management Studies and the Limits of Antagonism What do Business Schools Really Teach? The Role of Critical Management Studies in Business Education Can the Subaltern Teach? Performativity Otherwise Through Anthropophagy ☆ The title is inspired by Spivak “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1985). What to Stop Doing in Order to Get Things Done? A Critical Engagement with the Discourse of Critical Management Studies A [Critical] Ecological Model to Enabling Change: Promoting Diversity and Inclusion Border Thinking in Action: Should Critical Management Studies Get Anything Done? Reflections on the Theory–Action Debate About the Authors Author Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.716 | 0.726 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".