MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4237369651 · doi:10.5325/editwharrevi.37.1.v

Editor's Note

2021· article· en· W4237369651 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Ohler

Notice bibliographique

RevueEdith Wharton Review · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAudience measurementArt historyNovellaArtClassicsHistoryLiteratureLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This issue of the Edith Wharton Review is my last as editor, so I wish to recognize the work and collegiality of the journal's associate editors Myrto Drizou, Shannon Brennan, and Sharon Kim. Due to their scholarly acumen and commitment to the EWR, the journal has continued to publish innovative work on Wharton and her circle and expanded its readership. I am grateful to the members of the remarkable brain trust that is the EWR editorial board for their support and guidance.I have the pleasure of announcing that beginning with issue 37.2 Rita Bode will be the new editor. Rita is professor of English Literature at Trent University, Canada. Her main area of research is in nineteenth- and early twentieth- century North American and British literature with a special interest in transnational studies as seen in her chapter, “'My beloved Romola,'” in Edith Wharton and Cosmopolitanism, edited by Meredith Goldsmith and Emily Orlando (UP of Florida, 2015). She is also a contributor to Ferdâ Asya's Teaching Edith Wharton's Major Novels and Short Fiction with a project she undertook with Sirpa Salenius (University of Eastern Finland): “Students Abroad – In the Classroom: A Transatlantic Assignment on Edith Wharton's “Roman Fever” and is part of Oxford University Press's The Complete Works of Edith Wharton (general editor, Carol Singley), responsible for Volume 7, The Novellas. She has co-edited two volumes of essays on Canadian author, L. M. Montgomery: L. M. Montgomery's Rainbow Valleys: The Ontario Years, 1911–42 (MQUP [McGill-Queen's UP], 2015), with Lesley D. Clement, and L. M. Montgomery and the Matter of Nature(s) (MQUP, 2018), with anthropologist Jean Mitchell. The latter work was awarded ACQL's (Association of Canadian and Québec Literatures) 2018 Gabrielle Roy Prize (English) for the best book-length study in Canadian and Québec literary criticism. She recently co-edited, with Monika Elbert, American Women's Regionalist Fiction: Mapping the Gothic (Palgrave, 2021). Other publications include work on George Eliot, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Harriet Prescott Spofford, among others. We are fortunate to have Rita as our new editor.First in this issue is Mary Carney's “Improvised Chase: Notes on Wharton Studies,” a bibliographical article that “provides an overview of significant events, archival findings, major books, and select journal articles” in Wharton studies published since the 2014 thirtieth anniversary issue of the EWR. The article promises to be an important resource for anyone interested in recent Wharton scholarship. Next is Emily J. Orlando's “Edith Wharton and the Architect: The Olney-Beecher version of ‘The Keys of Heaven.’” This archival article remedies the fact that “the only scholarly attention paid to the two abandoned Wharton novels called ‘The Keys of Heaven’ has focused on the ‘Praslin version,’ a retelling of a murder-suicide from 1840s Paris.” Orlando finds that the Olney-Beecher version depicts previously undocumented aspects of Wharton's relationship with Ogden Codman, with whom she worked on The Decoration of Houses (1897). The third article is Emma Aylor's “‘Nay, rather Lord, between’: The Unification of Body and Spirit in Wharton's Deathbed Dramatic Monologues,” which won the 2021 Elsa Nettels Prize for a Beginning Scholar. The article examines “The Leper's Funeral and Death,” unpublished in Wharton's lifetime, and “Margaret of Cortona,” published in 1901. In her analysis of these poems, Aylor argues that Wharton “draws attention to the simultaneous fragility and persistence of the human: between and beyond traditional Christian divisions of body and soul.” Following the article is a roundtable review of Arielle Zibrak's engaging consideration in Guilty Pleasures of “the specifically pleasurable forms of feminine guilt and desire stimulated by supposedly ‘lowbrow’ aesthetic tendencies.” This is followed by reviews of three other notable books: Melanie V. Dawson's Edith Wharton and the Modern Privileges of Age, Laura Rattray's Edith Wharton and Genre: Beyond Fiction, and Emily Coit's American Snobs: Transatlantic Novelists, Liberal Culture and the Genteel Tradition.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,280
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEdith Wharton ReviewMême sujetAmerican and British Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207