MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237369651 · doi:10.5325/editwharrevi.37.1.v

Editor's Note

2021· article· en· W4237369651 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Ohler

Bibliographic record

VenueEdith Wharton Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudience measurementArt historyNovellaArtClassicsHistoryLiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This issue of the Edith Wharton Review is my last as editor, so I wish to recognize the work and collegiality of the journal's associate editors Myrto Drizou, Shannon Brennan, and Sharon Kim. Due to their scholarly acumen and commitment to the EWR, the journal has continued to publish innovative work on Wharton and her circle and expanded its readership. I am grateful to the members of the remarkable brain trust that is the EWR editorial board for their support and guidance.I have the pleasure of announcing that beginning with issue 37.2 Rita Bode will be the new editor. Rita is professor of English Literature at Trent University, Canada. Her main area of research is in nineteenth- and early twentieth- century North American and British literature with a special interest in transnational studies as seen in her chapter, “'My beloved Romola,'” in Edith Wharton and Cosmopolitanism, edited by Meredith Goldsmith and Emily Orlando (UP of Florida, 2015). She is also a contributor to Ferdâ Asya's Teaching Edith Wharton's Major Novels and Short Fiction with a project she undertook with Sirpa Salenius (University of Eastern Finland): “Students Abroad – In the Classroom: A Transatlantic Assignment on Edith Wharton's “Roman Fever” and is part of Oxford University Press's The Complete Works of Edith Wharton (general editor, Carol Singley), responsible for Volume 7, The Novellas. She has co-edited two volumes of essays on Canadian author, L. M. Montgomery: L. M. Montgomery's Rainbow Valleys: The Ontario Years, 1911–42 (MQUP [McGill-Queen's UP], 2015), with Lesley D. Clement, and L. M. Montgomery and the Matter of Nature(s) (MQUP, 2018), with anthropologist Jean Mitchell. The latter work was awarded ACQL's (Association of Canadian and Québec Literatures) 2018 Gabrielle Roy Prize (English) for the best book-length study in Canadian and Québec literary criticism. She recently co-edited, with Monika Elbert, American Women's Regionalist Fiction: Mapping the Gothic (Palgrave, 2021). Other publications include work on George Eliot, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Harriet Prescott Spofford, among others. We are fortunate to have Rita as our new editor.First in this issue is Mary Carney's “Improvised Chase: Notes on Wharton Studies,” a bibliographical article that “provides an overview of significant events, archival findings, major books, and select journal articles” in Wharton studies published since the 2014 thirtieth anniversary issue of the EWR. The article promises to be an important resource for anyone interested in recent Wharton scholarship. Next is Emily J. Orlando's “Edith Wharton and the Architect: The Olney-Beecher version of ‘The Keys of Heaven.’” This archival article remedies the fact that “the only scholarly attention paid to the two abandoned Wharton novels called ‘The Keys of Heaven’ has focused on the ‘Praslin version,’ a retelling of a murder-suicide from 1840s Paris.” Orlando finds that the Olney-Beecher version depicts previously undocumented aspects of Wharton's relationship with Ogden Codman, with whom she worked on The Decoration of Houses (1897). The third article is Emma Aylor's “‘Nay, rather Lord, between’: The Unification of Body and Spirit in Wharton's Deathbed Dramatic Monologues,” which won the 2021 Elsa Nettels Prize for a Beginning Scholar. The article examines “The Leper's Funeral and Death,” unpublished in Wharton's lifetime, and “Margaret of Cortona,” published in 1901. In her analysis of these poems, Aylor argues that Wharton “draws attention to the simultaneous fragility and persistence of the human: between and beyond traditional Christian divisions of body and soul.” Following the article is a roundtable review of Arielle Zibrak's engaging consideration in Guilty Pleasures of “the specifically pleasurable forms of feminine guilt and desire stimulated by supposedly ‘lowbrow’ aesthetic tendencies.” This is followed by reviews of three other notable books: Melanie V. Dawson's Edith Wharton and the Modern Privileges of Age, Laura Rattray's Edith Wharton and Genre: Beyond Fiction, and Emily Coit's American Snobs: Transatlantic Novelists, Liberal Culture and the Genteel Tradition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdith Wharton ReviewSame topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207