How and Why Do They Use Dietary Supplements? Unveiling Dietary Supplements Consumption in Social Commerce in China
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dietary supplements (DS) are used by consumers all over the world to treat disease, prevent disease, or promote health.Various categories of DS are widely distributed and intensively advertised through the Internet and social media.However, in spite of the fact that clinical studies show some DS are ineffective in fulfilling their functional purposes, consumers are committed to the purchase and use of these DS.This apparent paradox leads us to seek answers for the following two research questions: "What are the benefits achieved by committed DS users?" and "How do they practice in order to achieve those benefits?"By answering these two research questions, this study aims to understand and interpret the particular horizons of meaning associated with a specific consumption object, and the variety of ways in which people consume.DS consumption in social commerce in China provides the research context and facilitates the examination of the benefits achieved by DS consumers and their practices for achieving those benefits.Active interviewing was employed to obtain a rich set of data from twenty-two mass elite females who are committed to the consumption of DS in the context of social commerce in China.Bourdieu's and Giddens's sociological theories of structure-agency dialectic provide the theoretical lens for this research.In addition, four foundational works that apply sociological perspectives to understand individuals' health consumption and promotion behaviors assist with the analysis: Joy and Venkatesh's (1994) and Thompson and Hirschman's (1995) theories of the body culture and morality, Abel's (1991) theory of health-related lifestyles, and Balbo's (2007) theory of the gender perspective in health promotion.iii A grounded theory analysis based on the constructivist view and abductive reasoning revealed that individuals' DS consumption was influenced by the structureagency dialectic, in which four different strategies were developed: self-learning, disciplined use, consumerism, and socializing.While practicing the four strategies, individuals selectively act upon the choices existing in the structure to actively engage in health promotion and to relieve the tensions caused by the structure-agency interplay, for example, the difficulty in evaluating the functional effectiveness of DS products.As a result, individuals achieve not only functional benefits from DS consumption but also various purposes associated with identity expression and status distinction.In this process, multiple layers of meanings of DS consumption are socially constructed.Importantly, this research provides implications for the DS consumption literature, health promotion literature, and consumer behavior literature.Recommendations for health product marketers and health promotion policymakers are suggested.Opportunities for future research are also proposed and discussed.I would like to express my most sincere gratitude to my co-supervisors -Dr.Leighann Neilson and Dr. Shaobo Ji -for their guidance and encouragement throughout my doctoral studies.As my mentors, they have shared with me their time, expertise, and insight, which helps me to become a better researcher.Furthermore, as my friends, they have offered me enormous trust
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».