MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238158444 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-14371

How and Why Do They Use Dietary Supplements? Unveiling Dietary Supplements Consumption in Social Commerce in China

2020· dissertation· en· W4238158444 on OpenAlexaff
Yun Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructure and agencyConsumption (sociology)Context (archaeology)Agency (philosophy)ConsumerismSociologyPublic relationsMarketingPsychologyBusinessPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary supplements (DS) are used by consumers all over the world to treat disease, prevent disease, or promote health.Various categories of DS are widely distributed and intensively advertised through the Internet and social media.However, in spite of the fact that clinical studies show some DS are ineffective in fulfilling their functional purposes, consumers are committed to the purchase and use of these DS.This apparent paradox leads us to seek answers for the following two research questions: "What are the benefits achieved by committed DS users?" and "How do they practice in order to achieve those benefits?"By answering these two research questions, this study aims to understand and interpret the particular horizons of meaning associated with a specific consumption object, and the variety of ways in which people consume.DS consumption in social commerce in China provides the research context and facilitates the examination of the benefits achieved by DS consumers and their practices for achieving those benefits.Active interviewing was employed to obtain a rich set of data from twenty-two mass elite females who are committed to the consumption of DS in the context of social commerce in China.Bourdieu's and Giddens's sociological theories of structure-agency dialectic provide the theoretical lens for this research.In addition, four foundational works that apply sociological perspectives to understand individuals' health consumption and promotion behaviors assist with the analysis: Joy and Venkatesh's (1994) and Thompson and Hirschman's (1995) theories of the body culture and morality, Abel's (1991) theory of health-related lifestyles, and Balbo's (2007) theory of the gender perspective in health promotion.iii A grounded theory analysis based on the constructivist view and abductive reasoning revealed that individuals' DS consumption was influenced by the structureagency dialectic, in which four different strategies were developed: self-learning, disciplined use, consumerism, and socializing.While practicing the four strategies, individuals selectively act upon the choices existing in the structure to actively engage in health promotion and to relieve the tensions caused by the structure-agency interplay, for example, the difficulty in evaluating the functional effectiveness of DS products.As a result, individuals achieve not only functional benefits from DS consumption but also various purposes associated with identity expression and status distinction.In this process, multiple layers of meanings of DS consumption are socially constructed.Importantly, this research provides implications for the DS consumption literature, health promotion literature, and consumer behavior literature.Recommendations for health product marketers and health promotion policymakers are suggested.Opportunities for future research are also proposed and discussed.I would like to express my most sincere gratitude to my co-supervisors -Dr.Leighann Neilson and Dr. Shaobo Ji -for their guidance and encouragement throughout my doctoral studies.As my mentors, they have shared with me their time, expertise, and insight, which helps me to become a better researcher.Furthermore, as my friends, they have offered me enormous trust

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207