Obituaries/Nécrologie
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Don was born in East Oxford Township, Ontario, in the little town of Curries.The fourth child of six in his family, he enjoyed the years growing up on a farm, receiving public school training in Curries, and secondary education from Woodstock Collegiate.In May of 1930, Don was granted his Bachelor's degree from the Faculty of Forestry at the University of Toronto.From that time, life was spent in the north, first with the Ontario Forestry Branch in Sault Ste.Marie for five years, then with Consolidated Paper in Grand' Mbre, Quebec for seven years.There he met his future wife, Germaine, and they were married a year later in 1937.He returned to Ontario in 1942 to work under Ham Low at the Ontario-Minnesota Pulp and Paper, later Boise Cascade, in Fort Frances.The Company had just obtained its h t concession agreement with the Government, and was in the process of opening up the East Patricia in the Kenora division and the Seine in Fort Frances.In October of 1943, Don and his family moved to Kenora where they spent the next 20 years.During those years, Don lived through the introduction of many new ideas and technology, including the startup of the #10 paper machine in Kenora, suggestive of the later kraft mill, and the beginning of planting in 1950 with operations certainly small compared to today's standards.Don returned to Fort Frances in May 1963 along with the relocated Forestry Dept.A moment of particular significance was the morning of 14 Dec. 1965, when they all learned they had become part of Boise Cascade Corp.After many years as Chief Forester, Don retired in 197 1.Retirement brought lots of time to devote to his love of gardening and tree farming.The Ontario "Environmental Assessment7' hearing proceedings were an item that he followed very closely.Don maintained a very strong interest in Forestry, and always welcomed a chance to get out in the woods to see what was going on.He was among the group of Foresters who formed the "Kenora Forestry Discussion Group" that eventually became the Lake of the Woods Section.A strong supporter of the CIF, Don and Germaine attended many National Meet-
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».