MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239076430 · doi:10.5558/tfc77913-5

Obituaries/Nécrologie

2001· article· fr· W4239076430 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Don was born in East Oxford Township, Ontario, in the little town of Curries.The fourth child of six in his family, he enjoyed the years growing up on a farm, receiving public school training in Curries, and secondary education from Woodstock Collegiate.In May of 1930, Don was granted his Bachelor's degree from the Faculty of Forestry at the University of Toronto.From that time, life was spent in the north, first with the Ontario Forestry Branch in Sault Ste.Marie for five years, then with Consolidated Paper in Grand' Mbre, Quebec for seven years.There he met his future wife, Germaine, and they were married a year later in 1937.He returned to Ontario in 1942 to work under Ham Low at the Ontario-Minnesota Pulp and Paper, later Boise Cascade, in Fort Frances.The Company had just obtained its h t concession agreement with the Government, and was in the process of opening up the East Patricia in the Kenora division and the Seine in Fort Frances.In October of 1943, Don and his family moved to Kenora where they spent the next 20 years.During those years, Don lived through the introduction of many new ideas and technology, including the startup of the #10 paper machine in Kenora, suggestive of the later kraft mill, and the beginning of planting in 1950 with operations certainly small compared to today's standards.Don returned to Fort Frances in May 1963 along with the relocated Forestry Dept.A moment of particular significance was the morning of 14 Dec. 1965, when they all learned they had become part of Boise Cascade Corp.After many years as Chief Forester, Don retired in 197 1.Retirement brought lots of time to devote to his love of gardening and tree farming.The Ontario "Environmental Assessment7' hearing proceedings were an item that he followed very closely.Don maintained a very strong interest in Forestry, and always welcomed a chance to get out in the woods to see what was going on.He was among the group of Foresters who formed the "Kenora Forestry Discussion Group" that eventually became the Lake of the Woods Section.A strong supporter of the CIF, Don and Germaine attended many National Meet-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry ChronicleSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207