Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Harrowing Passages Edward Pickering (bio) Russell Fraser, The Three Romes: Moscow, Constantinople, and Rome. Transaction, 2008. 332 pages. $34.95 pb; Russell Fraser, From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel. University of South Carolina Press, 2009. 232 pages. $34.95; Andrew Lambert, The Gates of Hell: Sir John Franklin’s Tragic Quest for the Northwest Passage. Yale University Press, 2009. 456 pages. $32.50; Anthony Brandt, The Man Who Ate His Boots: The Tragic History of the Search for the Northwest Passage. Knopf, 2010. 464 pages. Illustrated. $28.95; Dan Simmons, The Terror. Back Bay Books, 2007. 770 pages. $14.99 pb; Dallas Murphy, Rounding the Horn: Being a Story of Williwaws and Windjammers, Drake, Darwin, Murdered Missionaries and Naked Natives—a Deck’s-Eye View of Cape Horn. Basic Books, 2005. 384 pages. $16.95 pb; David Grann, The Lost City of Z: A Tale of Deadly Obsession in the Amazon. Vintage, 2010. 448 pages. Illustrated. $15.95 pb. The six books under review here relate to travel or exploration or to both. Recent publications, they fall into several genres—and in certain instances into several at once: biography, history, travelogue, travel essay, and fiction. Collectively they span the globe from Canada’s far north to South America’s southernmost tip, from Moscow to Mato Grosso, or, as the title of one of them reads, From China to Peru, and points elsewhere and in between. The five authors are a retired English professor, a naval historian, a novelist best known for his science fiction, and two journalists who have also written fiction, one specializing in “sailing and marine matters,” and the other a staff writer for the New Yorker. Without indexing them further or groping after generalities that will somehow embrace and connect them all, I will simply take the books as they came my way. I begin with Russell Fraser, a retired English professor and longtime contributor to these pages, who has recently published two books of travel writing. The first, The Three Romes: Moscow, Constantinople, and Rome, is a reprint. In 1985, when the book appeared, the cities of its title, especially Moscow, were very different places than now; and the publisher was Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, not Transaction. In a lengthy introduction to the new edition Fraser casts a backward glance on the project, shedding valuable light on the book’s origins and aims. The second of his two books, From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel, published in 2009 by the University of South Carolina Press, brings together twelve travel essays, most of which appeared in the Virginia Quarterly Review. The Three Romes—a book with “intention,” which is Fraser’s word but which reflects the publisher William Jovanovich’s wishes—is much the better [End Page 618] of the two and is well worth reprinting. Fraser’s intention (given below) entailed deep research into the histories of the cities in conjunction with his firsthand experience, and for this reason the book is more durable than some travel books. Simply put, the book has an argument to make. All but the very best travel books are destined to fade with the passage of time, but Fraser’s book has a spark of staying power, and this despite the demise of the Soviet Union, Fraser’s bugbear and the subject of some of his best writing. By comparison From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel is uneven—perhaps a facile criticism to make since essay collections are by nature uneven. Here, however, Fraser’s limitations as a travel writer are too much in view, while in The Three Romes they remain safely offstage. I won’t dwell on these limitations—only to note that persona counts and that it counts enormously in the traditional line of travel writing to which Fraser belongs, and that Fraser has not created a winning persona. Fraser is at his best in From China to Peru in those essays in which he recounts history, as for example the Battle of Culloden, in one of the collection’s most successful essays, or the exploits of Peter the Great in the essay on St. Petersburg. He is generally not at his...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle