MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239238590 · doi:10.1353/sew.2010.0047

Harrowing Passages

2010· article· en· W4239238590 on OpenAlex
Edward C. Pickering

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œSewanee review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harrowing Passages Edward Pickering (bio) Russell Fraser, The Three Romes: Moscow, Constantinople, and Rome. Transaction, 2008. 332 pages. $34.95 pb; Russell Fraser, From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel. University of South Carolina Press, 2009. 232 pages. $34.95; Andrew Lambert, The Gates of Hell: Sir John Franklin’s Tragic Quest for the Northwest Passage. Yale University Press, 2009. 456 pages. $32.50; Anthony Brandt, The Man Who Ate His Boots: The Tragic History of the Search for the Northwest Passage. Knopf, 2010. 464 pages. Illustrated. $28.95; Dan Simmons, The Terror. Back Bay Books, 2007. 770 pages. $14.99 pb; Dallas Murphy, Rounding the Horn: Being a Story of Williwaws and Windjammers, Drake, Darwin, Murdered Missionaries and Naked Natives—a Deck’s-Eye View of Cape Horn. Basic Books, 2005. 384 pages. $16.95 pb; David Grann, The Lost City of Z: A Tale of Deadly Obsession in the Amazon. Vintage, 2010. 448 pages. Illustrated. $15.95 pb. The six books under review here relate to travel or exploration or to both. Recent publications, they fall into several genres—and in certain instances into several at once: biography, history, travelogue, travel essay, and fiction. Collectively they span the globe from Canada’s far north to South America’s southernmost tip, from Moscow to Mato Grosso, or, as the title of one of them reads, From China to Peru, and points elsewhere and in between. The five authors are a retired English professor, a naval historian, a novelist best known for his science fiction, and two journalists who have also written fiction, one specializing in “sailing and marine matters,” and the other a staff writer for the New Yorker. Without indexing them further or groping after generalities that will somehow embrace and connect them all, I will simply take the books as they came my way. I begin with Russell Fraser, a retired English professor and longtime contributor to these pages, who has recently published two books of travel writing. The first, The Three Romes: Moscow, Constantinople, and Rome, is a reprint. In 1985, when the book appeared, the cities of its title, especially Moscow, were very different places than now; and the publisher was Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, not Transaction. In a lengthy introduction to the new edition Fraser casts a backward glance on the project, shedding valuable light on the book’s origins and aims. The second of his two books, From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel, published in 2009 by the University of South Carolina Press, brings together twelve travel essays, most of which appeared in the Virginia Quarterly Review. The Three Romes—a book with “intention,” which is Fraser’s word but which reflects the publisher William Jovanovich’s wishes—is much the better [End Page 618] of the two and is well worth reprinting. Fraser’s intention (given below) entailed deep research into the histories of the cities in conjunction with his firsthand experience, and for this reason the book is more durable than some travel books. Simply put, the book has an argument to make. All but the very best travel books are destined to fade with the passage of time, but Fraser’s book has a spark of staying power, and this despite the demise of the Soviet Union, Fraser’s bugbear and the subject of some of his best writing. By comparison From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel is uneven—perhaps a facile criticism to make since essay collections are by nature uneven. Here, however, Fraser’s limitations as a travel writer are too much in view, while in The Three Romes they remain safely offstage. I won’t dwell on these limitations—only to note that persona counts and that it counts enormously in the traditional line of travel writing to which Fraser belongs, and that Fraser has not created a winning persona. Fraser is at his best in From China to Peru in those essays in which he recounts history, as for example the Battle of Culloden, in one of the collection’s most successful essays, or the exploits of Peter the Great in the essay on St. Petersburg. He is generally not at his...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it