MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239238590 · doi:10.1353/sew.2010.0047

Harrowing Passages

2010· article· en· W4239238590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward C. Pickering

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œSewanee review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harrowing Passages Edward Pickering (bio) Russell Fraser, The Three Romes: Moscow, Constantinople, and Rome. Transaction, 2008. 332 pages. $34.95 pb; Russell Fraser, From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel. University of South Carolina Press, 2009. 232 pages. $34.95; Andrew Lambert, The Gates of Hell: Sir John Franklin’s Tragic Quest for the Northwest Passage. Yale University Press, 2009. 456 pages. $32.50; Anthony Brandt, The Man Who Ate His Boots: The Tragic History of the Search for the Northwest Passage. Knopf, 2010. 464 pages. Illustrated. $28.95; Dan Simmons, The Terror. Back Bay Books, 2007. 770 pages. $14.99 pb; Dallas Murphy, Rounding the Horn: Being a Story of Williwaws and Windjammers, Drake, Darwin, Murdered Missionaries and Naked Natives—a Deck’s-Eye View of Cape Horn. Basic Books, 2005. 384 pages. $16.95 pb; David Grann, The Lost City of Z: A Tale of Deadly Obsession in the Amazon. Vintage, 2010. 448 pages. Illustrated. $15.95 pb. The six books under review here relate to travel or exploration or to both. Recent publications, they fall into several genres—and in certain instances into several at once: biography, history, travelogue, travel essay, and fiction. Collectively they span the globe from Canada’s far north to South America’s southernmost tip, from Moscow to Mato Grosso, or, as the title of one of them reads, From China to Peru, and points elsewhere and in between. The five authors are a retired English professor, a naval historian, a novelist best known for his science fiction, and two journalists who have also written fiction, one specializing in “sailing and marine matters,” and the other a staff writer for the New Yorker. Without indexing them further or groping after generalities that will somehow embrace and connect them all, I will simply take the books as they came my way. I begin with Russell Fraser, a retired English professor and longtime contributor to these pages, who has recently published two books of travel writing. The first, The Three Romes: Moscow, Constantinople, and Rome, is a reprint. In 1985, when the book appeared, the cities of its title, especially Moscow, were very different places than now; and the publisher was Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, not Transaction. In a lengthy introduction to the new edition Fraser casts a backward glance on the project, shedding valuable light on the book’s origins and aims. The second of his two books, From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel, published in 2009 by the University of South Carolina Press, brings together twelve travel essays, most of which appeared in the Virginia Quarterly Review. The Three Romes—a book with “intention,” which is Fraser’s word but which reflects the publisher William Jovanovich’s wishes—is much the better [End Page 618] of the two and is well worth reprinting. Fraser’s intention (given below) entailed deep research into the histories of the cities in conjunction with his firsthand experience, and for this reason the book is more durable than some travel books. Simply put, the book has an argument to make. All but the very best travel books are destined to fade with the passage of time, but Fraser’s book has a spark of staying power, and this despite the demise of the Soviet Union, Fraser’s bugbear and the subject of some of his best writing. By comparison From China to Peru: A Memoir of Travel is uneven—perhaps a facile criticism to make since essay collections are by nature uneven. Here, however, Fraser’s limitations as a travel writer are too much in view, while in The Three Romes they remain safely offstage. I won’t dwell on these limitations—only to note that persona counts and that it counts enormously in the traditional line of travel writing to which Fraser belongs, and that Fraser has not created a winning persona. Fraser is at his best in From China to Peru in those essays in which he recounts history, as for example the Battle of Culloden, in one of the collection’s most successful essays, or the exploits of Peter the Great in the essay on St. Petersburg. He is generally not at his...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1700.085

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œSewanee reviewSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207