MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4239729921 · doi:10.1108/s1746-979120150000011027

List of Contributors

2015· other· en· W4239729921 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueBusiness Law and Ethics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublishingMetropolitan areaLibrary scienceManagementSociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceHistoryArchaeologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations (Research on Emotion in Organizations, Vol. 11), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xiv. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1746-979120150000011027 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Linda Patricia Alker Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK Marilena Antoniadou Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK Neal M. Ashkanasy UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Patricia L. Baratta Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada William J. Becker Department of Management, Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA Ethel Brundin Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Olof Brunninge Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Nuno Da Camara Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Jason J. Dahling Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA Sanket S. Dash Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, India Victor Dulewicz Henley Business School, University of Reading, Henley-on-Thames, UK Michael J. Gill School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK Charmine E. J. Härtel UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Malcolm Higgs Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Peter J. Jordan Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Sophie A. Kay Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA Sandra Kiffin-Petersen Business School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia Carol T. Kulik School of Management, City West Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Dirk Lindebaum University of Liverpool Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Magdalena Markowska Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Jim A. McCleskey North American University, Houston, TX, USA Anders Melander Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Avina J. Mendonca Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, India Nidhi Mishra Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, India Kathryn Moura Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Jennifer M. O’Connor UQ Business School ,The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Sanjeewa Perera School of Management, City West Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Suzanne J. Peterson Department of Management, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Markus Plate Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Christopher S. Reina Department of Management, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Amanda Roan UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Peter John Sandiford Business School, Faculty of the Professions, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Jeffrey R. Spence Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada Ashlea C. Troth Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Nickolas F. Vargovic Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA David A. Waldman Department of Management, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Gillian Wright Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK Wilfred J. Zerbe Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada Book Chapters New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations Research on Emotion in Organizations New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations Copyright Page Dedication List of Contributors About the Editors New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations Section I: Novel Methodological Approaches to Studying Emotions in Organizations Using Physiological Methods to Study Emotions in Organizations A Phenomenology of Feeling: Examining the Experience of Emotion in Organizations Understanding Lecturers’ Perceptions of Workplace Fear: An Interpretive Study in the Cypriot Higher Education Context Shame and the Undoing of Leadership – An Analysis of Shame in Organizations A Qualitative Study of Emotional Intelligence and Its Underlying Processes and Outcomes in Management Studies A Riddle, Wrapped in a Mystery, Inside an Enigma … or Just Multidimensional? Testing the Multidimensional Structure of Boredom Section II: Contextualization Developments in Studying Emotion in Organizations Family Firm Longevity and Resource Management: Financial and Social-Emotional Wealth Rationalities A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Identification and Dis-Identification: An Emotions Perspective Self-Referential Emotion Regulatory Model of Work Design The Current State of the Stream One Ability Model (SOAM) of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and the Future of EI Section III: Novel Areas of Empirical Investigation of Emotion in Organizations Exploring the Relationship between Perceptions of Organizational Emotional Intelligence and Turnover Intentions amongst Employees: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction Using Expertise as a Firewall: Exploring Emotion Work of Novices and Experts Crossing the Impropriety Threshold: A Study of Experiences of Excessive Anger Understanding Flow among Academicians Eyes on the Prize: A Longitudinal Study of Action–State Orientation, Affect, and Academic Self-Regulation The Critical Role of Emotions in the Recruitment, Retention, and Wellbeing of Volunteers – A Review and Call for Research Conference Reviewers

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,076
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetBusiness Law and EthicsTravaux en français237 207