Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations (Research on Emotion in Organizations, Vol. 11), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xiv. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1746-979120150000011027 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Linda Patricia Alker Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK Marilena Antoniadou Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK Neal M. Ashkanasy UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Patricia L. Baratta Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada William J. Becker Department of Management, Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA Ethel Brundin Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Olof Brunninge Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Nuno Da Camara Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Jason J. Dahling Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA Sanket S. Dash Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, India Victor Dulewicz Henley Business School, University of Reading, Henley-on-Thames, UK Michael J. Gill School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK Charmine E. J. Härtel UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Malcolm Higgs Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Peter J. Jordan Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Sophie A. Kay Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA Sandra Kiffin-Petersen Business School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia Carol T. Kulik School of Management, City West Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Dirk Lindebaum University of Liverpool Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Magdalena Markowska Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Jim A. McCleskey North American University, Houston, TX, USA Anders Melander Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Avina J. Mendonca Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, India Nidhi Mishra Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, India Kathryn Moura Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Jennifer M. O’Connor UQ Business School ,The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Sanjeewa Perera School of Management, City West Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Suzanne J. Peterson Department of Management, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Markus Plate Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden Christopher S. Reina Department of Management, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Amanda Roan UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Peter John Sandiford Business School, Faculty of the Professions, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Jeffrey R. Spence Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada Ashlea C. Troth Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Nickolas F. Vargovic Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA David A. Waldman Department of Management, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Gillian Wright Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK Wilfred J. Zerbe Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada Book Chapters New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations Research on Emotion in Organizations New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations Copyright Page Dedication List of Contributors About the Editors New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations Section I: Novel Methodological Approaches to Studying Emotions in Organizations Using Physiological Methods to Study Emotions in Organizations A Phenomenology of Feeling: Examining the Experience of Emotion in Organizations Understanding Lecturers’ Perceptions of Workplace Fear: An Interpretive Study in the Cypriot Higher Education Context Shame and the Undoing of Leadership – An Analysis of Shame in Organizations A Qualitative Study of Emotional Intelligence and Its Underlying Processes and Outcomes in Management Studies A Riddle, Wrapped in a Mystery, Inside an Enigma … or Just Multidimensional? Testing the Multidimensional Structure of Boredom Section II: Contextualization Developments in Studying Emotion in Organizations Family Firm Longevity and Resource Management: Financial and Social-Emotional Wealth Rationalities A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Identification and Dis-Identification: An Emotions Perspective Self-Referential Emotion Regulatory Model of Work Design The Current State of the Stream One Ability Model (SOAM) of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and the Future of EI Section III: Novel Areas of Empirical Investigation of Emotion in Organizations Exploring the Relationship between Perceptions of Organizational Emotional Intelligence and Turnover Intentions amongst Employees: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction Using Expertise as a Firewall: Exploring Emotion Work of Novices and Experts Crossing the Impropriety Threshold: A Study of Experiences of Excessive Anger Understanding Flow among Academicians Eyes on the Prize: A Longitudinal Study of Action–State Orientation, Affect, and Academic Self-Regulation The Critical Role of Emotions in the Recruitment, Retention, and Wellbeing of Volunteers – A Review and Call for Research Conference Reviewers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".