MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4240632412 · doi:10.1093/ywes/man006

XVII * New Literatures

2008· article· en· W4240632412 sur OpenAlexaffabout
F. Abodunrin, Leigh Dale, Chris Tiffin, Ruth Lane, Suzanne Scafe, Rachel Farebrother, C. Herbert, N. Wattie

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Year s Work in English Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAfrican history and culture studies
Établissements canadiensConcordia UniversityVancouver Island University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFilm directorContext (archaeology)Movie theaterIndigenousWhite (mutation)Section (typography)HistoryColonialismIronyTreasureArt historyArtMedia studiesAnthropologyGender studiesLiteratureSociologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This chapter has six sections: 1 . Africa; 2 . Australia; 3 . Canada; 4 . The Caribbean; 5 . The Indian Subcontinent and Sri Lanka; 6 . New Zealand. Section 1 is by Femi Abodunrin; section 2 is by Leigh Dale and Chris Tiffin; section 3 is by Richard Lane; section 4 is by Suzanne Scafe; section 5 is by Rachel Farebrother and Caroline Herbert; section 6 is by Nelson Wattie. Often described as Africa's newest and least known art form, African cinema has received a great deal of critical attention lately. Françoise Pfaff, ed., Focus on African Films , is a collection of essays focusing on ‘the use of film as a means of expression and communication by subsaharan Black Africans’ (p. 1). The volume addresses the creative and critical disquiet that has surrounded the whole issue of cinematic representation of Africa and Africans as ‘mere backdrop—with stereotypically uncivilized, childish, or cruel natives—for triumphant acts by great White hunters and treasure seekers’ (p. 1). The emergence of indigenous African filmmakers, depicting a changing continent in precolonial, colonial and postcolonial stages, according to Pfaff, entailed the production of films ‘often serious and didactic rather than escapist although not lacking in humour and irony’, and the emergence of filmmakers and directors ‘who have often compared themselves to the griots (bards/chroniclers) of traditional African cultures’ (p. 2). Pioneer African writer and filmmaker Sembene Ousmane of Senegal articulates the context of African filmmakers’ responses to these Western depictions in ways similar to those of postcolonial literary writers: ‘We had to see, feel, and understand ourselves through the mirror of film. For us, African filmmakers, it was necessary to become political, to become involved in a struggle against all the ills of man's cupidity, envy, individualism, the nouveau-riche mentality, and all the things we have inherited from the colonial and neo-colonial systems’ (p. 2). If the initial response was what Pfaff has described as ‘dichotomous representations of idyllic precolonial life corrupted and destroyed by European colonizers’ (p. 3), African films have since evolved from counter-representation to historical portrayal. Notable examples include Sissoko's Guimba [Mali, 1995], which critically explores the traditional systems of government that led to abuses of power, and Gnoan M’Bala's Adanggaman [Ivory Coast, 2000] which forcefully investigates ‘the responsibilities of Africans in the establishment of the transatlantic slave trade’ (p. 3), to name just a few. In contrast to other books on African cinema, Focus on African Films offers unique and pluralistic perspectives on filmmaking from varied areas of Africa rather than a reductive assessment of the cinematic output of the continent. In short, it ‘provides an innovative, kaleidoscopic analysis of African films released since the 1950s. These films reflect quite distinct thematic, stylistic, and socio-economic characteristics, as detailed in the studies’ (p. 8). According to Pfaff, a critical examination of African films ‘should be as diverse as the registers and deliveries of griots, with amplitude for a broad range of views’ (p. 8). In his introduction, Pfaff considers this diversity: from the multiple roles that the average African filmmaker may be forced to undertake—or what Pfaff describes as ‘the creative dispersion of filmmakers who are simultaneously scriptwriters, producers, directors, and even distributors of their motion pictures!’ (p. 7)—to the constant revision of the very nature of their creative bent, for example in giving birth to styles close to indigenous dramatic arts, ‘as can be observed in the realm of Nigerian films and video productions, some of which use plots and structures directly influenced by Yoruba theatre’ (p. 7).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,790
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,861

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Year s Work in English StudiesMême sujetAfrican history and culture studiesTravaux en français237 207