XVII * New Literatures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This chapter has six sections: 1 . Africa; 2 . Australia; 3 . Canada; 4 . The Caribbean; 5 . The Indian Subcontinent and Sri Lanka; 6 . New Zealand. Section 1 is by Femi Abodunrin; section 2 is by Leigh Dale and Chris Tiffin; section 3 is by Richard Lane; section 4 is by Suzanne Scafe; section 5 is by Rachel Farebrother and Caroline Herbert; section 6 is by Nelson Wattie. Often described as Africa's newest and least known art form, African cinema has received a great deal of critical attention lately. Françoise Pfaff, ed., Focus on African Films , is a collection of essays focusing on ‘the use of film as a means of expression and communication by subsaharan Black Africans’ (p. 1). The volume addresses the creative and critical disquiet that has surrounded the whole issue of cinematic representation of Africa and Africans as ‘mere backdrop—with stereotypically uncivilized, childish, or cruel natives—for triumphant acts by great White hunters and treasure seekers’ (p. 1). The emergence of indigenous African filmmakers, depicting a changing continent in precolonial, colonial and postcolonial stages, according to Pfaff, entailed the production of films ‘often serious and didactic rather than escapist although not lacking in humour and irony’, and the emergence of filmmakers and directors ‘who have often compared themselves to the griots (bards/chroniclers) of traditional African cultures’ (p. 2). Pioneer African writer and filmmaker Sembene Ousmane of Senegal articulates the context of African filmmakers’ responses to these Western depictions in ways similar to those of postcolonial literary writers: ‘We had to see, feel, and understand ourselves through the mirror of film. For us, African filmmakers, it was necessary to become political, to become involved in a struggle against all the ills of man's cupidity, envy, individualism, the nouveau-riche mentality, and all the things we have inherited from the colonial and neo-colonial systems’ (p. 2). If the initial response was what Pfaff has described as ‘dichotomous representations of idyllic precolonial life corrupted and destroyed by European colonizers’ (p. 3), African films have since evolved from counter-representation to historical portrayal. Notable examples include Sissoko's Guimba [Mali, 1995], which critically explores the traditional systems of government that led to abuses of power, and Gnoan M’Bala's Adanggaman [Ivory Coast, 2000] which forcefully investigates ‘the responsibilities of Africans in the establishment of the transatlantic slave trade’ (p. 3), to name just a few. In contrast to other books on African cinema, Focus on African Films offers unique and pluralistic perspectives on filmmaking from varied areas of Africa rather than a reductive assessment of the cinematic output of the continent. In short, it ‘provides an innovative, kaleidoscopic analysis of African films released since the 1950s. These films reflect quite distinct thematic, stylistic, and socio-economic characteristics, as detailed in the studies’ (p. 8). According to Pfaff, a critical examination of African films ‘should be as diverse as the registers and deliveries of griots, with amplitude for a broad range of views’ (p. 8). In his introduction, Pfaff considers this diversity: from the multiple roles that the average African filmmaker may be forced to undertake—or what Pfaff describes as ‘the creative dispersion of filmmakers who are simultaneously scriptwriters, producers, directors, and even distributors of their motion pictures!’ (p. 7)—to the constant revision of the very nature of their creative bent, for example in giving birth to styles close to indigenous dramatic arts, ‘as can be observed in the realm of Nigerian films and video productions, some of which use plots and structures directly influenced by Yoruba theatre’ (p. 7).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».