MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240632412 · doi:10.1093/ywes/man006

XVII * New Literatures

2008· article· en· W4240632412 on OpenAlexaffabout
F. Abodunrin, Leigh Dale, Chris Tiffin, Ruth Lane, Suzanne Scafe, Rachel Farebrother, C. Herbert, N. Wattie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Year s Work in English Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityVancouver Island University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilm directorContext (archaeology)Movie theaterIndigenousWhite (mutation)Section (typography)HistoryColonialismIronyTreasureArt historyArtMedia studiesAnthropologyGender studiesLiteratureSociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter has six sections: 1 . Africa; 2 . Australia; 3 . Canada; 4 . The Caribbean; 5 . The Indian Subcontinent and Sri Lanka; 6 . New Zealand. Section 1 is by Femi Abodunrin; section 2 is by Leigh Dale and Chris Tiffin; section 3 is by Richard Lane; section 4 is by Suzanne Scafe; section 5 is by Rachel Farebrother and Caroline Herbert; section 6 is by Nelson Wattie. Often described as Africa's newest and least known art form, African cinema has received a great deal of critical attention lately. Françoise Pfaff, ed., Focus on African Films , is a collection of essays focusing on ‘the use of film as a means of expression and communication by subsaharan Black Africans’ (p. 1). The volume addresses the creative and critical disquiet that has surrounded the whole issue of cinematic representation of Africa and Africans as ‘mere backdrop—with stereotypically uncivilized, childish, or cruel natives—for triumphant acts by great White hunters and treasure seekers’ (p. 1). The emergence of indigenous African filmmakers, depicting a changing continent in precolonial, colonial and postcolonial stages, according to Pfaff, entailed the production of films ‘often serious and didactic rather than escapist although not lacking in humour and irony’, and the emergence of filmmakers and directors ‘who have often compared themselves to the griots (bards/chroniclers) of traditional African cultures’ (p. 2). Pioneer African writer and filmmaker Sembene Ousmane of Senegal articulates the context of African filmmakers’ responses to these Western depictions in ways similar to those of postcolonial literary writers: ‘We had to see, feel, and understand ourselves through the mirror of film. For us, African filmmakers, it was necessary to become political, to become involved in a struggle against all the ills of man's cupidity, envy, individualism, the nouveau-riche mentality, and all the things we have inherited from the colonial and neo-colonial systems’ (p. 2). If the initial response was what Pfaff has described as ‘dichotomous representations of idyllic precolonial life corrupted and destroyed by European colonizers’ (p. 3), African films have since evolved from counter-representation to historical portrayal. Notable examples include Sissoko's Guimba [Mali, 1995], which critically explores the traditional systems of government that led to abuses of power, and Gnoan M’Bala's Adanggaman [Ivory Coast, 2000] which forcefully investigates ‘the responsibilities of Africans in the establishment of the transatlantic slave trade’ (p. 3), to name just a few. In contrast to other books on African cinema, Focus on African Films offers unique and pluralistic perspectives on filmmaking from varied areas of Africa rather than a reductive assessment of the cinematic output of the continent. In short, it ‘provides an innovative, kaleidoscopic analysis of African films released since the 1950s. These films reflect quite distinct thematic, stylistic, and socio-economic characteristics, as detailed in the studies’ (p. 8). According to Pfaff, a critical examination of African films ‘should be as diverse as the registers and deliveries of griots, with amplitude for a broad range of views’ (p. 8). In his introduction, Pfaff considers this diversity: from the multiple roles that the average African filmmaker may be forced to undertake—or what Pfaff describes as ‘the creative dispersion of filmmakers who are simultaneously scriptwriters, producers, directors, and even distributors of their motion pictures!’ (p. 7)—to the constant revision of the very nature of their creative bent, for example in giving birth to styles close to indigenous dramatic arts, ‘as can be observed in the realm of Nigerian films and video productions, some of which use plots and structures directly influenced by Yoruba theatre’ (p. 7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Year s Work in English StudiesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207